Piyush Dilipbhai Shah v. The Madrs Aluminum Company

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.08.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE O.S.A.No.378 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Piyush Dilipbhai Shah ... Appellant Vs.

The Madras Aluminium Company Limited, having registered Office at Mettur Dam, R.S.636402, Salem District, Tamil Nadu.

Represented by its Authorized Signatory Mr.C.Murugeswaran.

... Respondent Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of O.S.Rules read with Clauses 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 25.07.2013 made in C.P.No.165 of 2012.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Ms.Varsha for Mr.K.Ramasamy

JUDGMENT

[Judgment of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]

1. There is no appearance on behalf of the appellant.

2. The position was no different on 04.01.2017 and 28.07.2017.

3. Ms.Varsha, appears on behalf of the respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, the connected pending application is closed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsm To The Sub Assistant Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Madras 104.

+2cc's to Mr.K.Ramasamy, Advocate, S.R.No.58770 O.S.A.No.378 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 NM(CO) CA(04/09/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/