S.Mathivanan v. D.Arumugam

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated:13.02.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Criminal Appeal No.469 of 2002 S.Mathivanan .. Appellant/Complainant Vs D.Arumugam .. Respondent/Accused Prayer: Criminal appeal preferred under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to against the judgment dated 10.12.2001 made in C.A.No.15 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pondicherry, acquitting the respondents herein by reversing the judgment made in STR.No.1545 of 1998 dated 29.03.2001 made by the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pondicherry.

For Petitioner :Mr.A.Balamurugan Legal Aid Counsel For Respondent :Mr.Jeyaganeshan

JUDGMENT

This appeal arises from the judgment dated 10.12.2001 made in C.A.No.15 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Sessions Judge, Pondicherry, acquitting the respondents herein by reversing the judgment made in STR.No.1545 of 1998 dated 29.03.2001 made by the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pondicherry.

2. By consent of both parties, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and to that effect they have filed a petition seeking to leave the compound the offence. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. By recording the settlement between the parties, the Criminal appeal is closed and the petition filed under section 320 of Cr.P.C (Petition seeking leave to compound the offence) is form part of the records. The State Legal Services Authority, Chennai is directed to pay remuneration to the learned Legal Aid counsel appearing for the appellant viz., Mr.A.Balamurugan.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ub To 1.The Additional Sessions Judge, Pondicherry.

2.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Pondicherry.

3.The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras.

4.The Secretary, State Legal Services Authority, Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.A.Balamurugan,Advocate, sr.no.10860 Criminal Appeal No.469 of 2002 RMP(21/03/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/