Annammal v. Maheswari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN S.A.No.704 of 2003 1.Annammal 2.Mani 3.Raman 4.Ammalammal 5.Selvi 6.Vijaya ... Appellants Vs.

1.Maheswari 2.Roopavathy 3.Vanaja 4.Chitraleka 5.Prabhavathy 6.Radhakrishnan 7.Shilashri 8.Jagannathan ... Respondents This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and decree dated 28.03.2002 in A.S.No.25 of 2001 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Maduranthagam confirming the Judgment and decree dated 19.02.2001 passed in O.S.No.62 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Maduranthagam.

For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.C.Shankar

JUDGMENT

In the earlier order passed by this Court dated 02.02.2010, the above Second Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution on the ground that there was no representation on behalf of the appellants as well as respondents.

2.Subsequently, the appellants have filed a restore-petition in CMP.No.213 of 2010, which was allowed and the above Second Appeal was restored and taken up for hearing on 10.06.2019. Even on that day, there was none appeared on the appellants' side and hence, this Court directed the Registry to list this appeal under the caption 'for dismissal' on 12.06.2019. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Today, (12.06.2019) when the matter is called, none appeared on behalf of the appellants, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Maduranthagam.

2.The District Munsif, Maduranthagam.

Copy to : The V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc to M/s.C.Shankar,Advocate Sr.No. 47290 AKM/12.09.19/2P-5C / S.A.No.704 of 2003 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/