Sabari, Aged 33 Years, v. State By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Thirtieth day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice N.SATHISH KUMAR CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13943 of 2018 1 SABARI [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 NAGARAJ Vs STATE BY, [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G1-MADURANTHAGAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

CR. NO. 193 OF 2018.

For Petitioner : M/S.M.R.ELAVARASAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.M.PRABHAVATHI, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable u/s.294[b], 323, 341, 506[i] of IPC in Crime No.193/2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to property dispute the petitioners along with the other accused said to have abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and also assaulted him with hands and threatened him with dire consequences.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that A1 and A3 were arrested on 17.05.2018 and are still in custody.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations against the petitioners in the FIR, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Maduranthagam, Kancheepuram District on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall report before respondent police daily at 6.30 p.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 30/05/2018 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURANTHAGAM, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPET. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G1-MADURANTHAGAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.M.R.ELAVARASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges in SR.NO. 9717 CRL OP.13943/2018 Date :30/05/2018 MLT-31/05/2018