← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10928/2004withdrawn dismissed

Tirupathi Kumar Khemka, v. The Collector Of Chennai,

2018-07-19Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.07.2018 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P.Nos.10928 to 10930 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.Nos.12821, 12822 & 12824 of 2004 W.P.No.10928 of 2004 Tirupathi Kumar Khemka ... Petitioner Vs.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Second Respondent's notice in D1.29614/2003 dated 07.04.2004 and quash the same and thereby forebear the respondents from in any manner whatsoever initiating any action /proceedings for recovery against the petitioner for alleged dues covered by the notice. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Anil Kumar for Mr.S.R.Rajagopal For Respondents: Mr.K.S.Suresh, Government Advocate W.P.No.10929 of 2004 Ravi Prakash Khemka ... Petitioner Vs.

... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Second Respondent's notice in D1.29614/2003 dated 07.04.2004 and quash the same and thereby forebear the respondents from in any manner whatsoever initiating any action /proceedings for recovery against the petitioner for alleged dues covered by the notice. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Anil Kumar for Mr.S.R.Rajagopal For Respondents: Mr.K.S.Suresh, Government Advocate W.P.No.10930 of 2004 Raj Kumar Khemka ... Petitioner Vs.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Second Respondent's notice in D1.29614/2003 dated 07.04.2004 and quash the same and thereby forebear the respondents from in any manner whatsoever initiating any action /proceedings for recovery against the petitioner for alleged dues covered by the notice. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Anil Kumar for Mr.S.R.Rajagopal For Respondents: Mr.K.S.Suresh, Government Advocate C O M M O N O R D E R Mr.V.Anil Kumar representing Mr.S.R.Rajagopal, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw the Writ Petitions and he also made endorsements to that effect.

2.Recording the same, the Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar maya To +1cc to Government Pleader sr.no.48504 W.P.Nos.10928 to 10930 of 2004 rj(co) nr 10/08/2018