Madras High CourtWP/1400/2010disposed of

C.Malango, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2017-11-22Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :22.11.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.1400 of 2010 1.C.Malango 2.S.P.Solairaj 3.Krishnaraj 4.Sugavanam 5.Shohana 6.Paramasivam 7.Durai Raj 8.Saroja 9.Johanbasha 10.P.G.Pugalenthi 11.T.Madhavan 12.K.Kasi 13.Nallathambi 14.Sivagurunathan 15.Rengasamy 16.Tamil Selvam 17.Tamil Mani 18.R.Kanakkarajan 19.Mohawared baffi cellakhan 20.Murugesan 21.Perumal 22.G.Shanmugham 23.M.Krishnamoorthy 24.M.Kannan 25.K.Chinnanan 26.K.Mani 27.Ponnudurai 28.N.Ganesan 29.Ponnmalai 30.Kandasamy ..Petitioners vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Secretary of Government, State Transport Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, Rep.by its Managing Director, T.N.S.T.C. Division II, Ramakrishna Road, Salem District.

3.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, Rep.by its General Manager, T.N.S.T.C. Division II, Bharathipuram, Dharmapuri District.

.. Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to treat all the petitioners as junior Assistants in the Second Respondent Corporation from the date of their original appointment from and give fitment, additional increment and all monetary and consequential benefits on that basis.

For Petitioners: Mr.K.Nagarajan For Respondents: Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari Government Advocate for R1 Mr.P.Paramasivadoss for R2 & R3

O R D E R

The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to treat the petitioners in the 2nd respondent Corporation from the date of their original appointment and give fitment, additional increment and all monetary and consequential benefits.

2.In respect of the relief sought for in this writ petition, it is necessary that the respondents should verify the service records of the respective writ petitioners and consider the case independently in accordance with the rules in force. In this regard, the writ petitioners have submitted a representation to the 2nd respondent. Thus, without going into the merits of the matter, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the writ petitioner on 19.02.2009 and on 19.03.2009 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petitioner is directed to enclose the copy of the writ petition along with the orders passed in this writ petition.

3.Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Secretary of Government, State Transport Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.Managing Director, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, T.N.S.T.C. Division II, Ramakrishna Road, Salem District.

3.General Manager, The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, T.N.S.T.C. Division II, Bharathipuram, Dharmapuri District.

+ 1 cc to Mr. K. Nagarajan, Advocate SR.83191 + 1 cc to the Government Pleader Sr.83683 W.P.No.1400 of 2010 CS-VI EU(13/12/2017)