← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/16869/2025granted

Iswaran v. The State Rep. By

2025-06-13Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar4 pages

CRL OP NO. 16869 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13-06-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP NO. 16869 of 2025 Iswaran .... Petitioner Vs State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District.

(Crime No.120 of 2025) .... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.120 of 2025 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.C.Deepakkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.04.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 194 of BNSS altered into 105 of BNS in connection with Crime No.120 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the 1/4

petitioner is said to have attacked the deceased Mayavan with wooden log leading to the death of the deceased. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person. He also submitted that the petitioner is in no way connected with the alleged offence. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, submitted that due to wordy quarrel and sudden provocation, the petitioner who consumed alcohol, had attacked the deceased with wooden log and thereby caused death .

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner and the petitioner himself is ready to abide by any condition, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with 2/4

two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for further interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required;

[d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses; [e] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

13-06-2025 3/4

M. NIRMAL KUMAR.,J.

Gv Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate - I, Mettur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District.

(Crime No.120 of 2025) 3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

CRL OP NO. 16869 of 2025 13.06.2025 4/4