S.Ranganathan, v. The Sub-Registrar, Hosur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.02.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.8064 of 2016 S.Ranganathan

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Sub-registrar, Hosur 2.The District Superintendent of police, Krishnagiri District.

...Respondents

PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 15.07.2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari For RR1 : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman Govt. Adocate For R2 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Addl. Public Prosecutor.

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 15.07.2015. 2.It is seen that the petitioner lodged the complaint in the year 2016. Now, almost three years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted now. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition, on fresh cause of action, if so advised.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsn To 1.The Sub-registrar, Hosur 2.The District Superintendent of police, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.V.Raghavachari, Advocate SR.No.14396 W.P.No.8064 of 2016 SR(CO) GMY(22/03/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/