Llayaselvam V v. State Rep By. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Ilayaselvam V ..Petitioner(s) Vs STATE REP BY. The Inspector of Police Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District.

(Crime No. 86 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to enlarge the Petitioners on Anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest concered in Crime No. 86 of 2026, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District. For Petitioner(s):

M/S. KAMALA KANTH S For Respondent(s):

MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.86 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner

abused and assaulted the defacto complainant. Due to which, the defacto complainant sustained injuries. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish substantial sureties for his due release and to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court and therefore, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submits that the investigation is not yet completed and if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, there is a possibility that he will tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation. He would further submit that four similar previous cases pending against the petitioner and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the allegations and also the bad antecedent of the petitioner and the fact that the case is in the initial stage of the investigation and that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is essential, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 11-06-2026 GBI To 1.The Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

GBI 11-06-2026