P.Arumugam, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D. KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.16411 of 2014 P. Arumugam ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai.

2. The Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Big Street, Tiruvannamalai.

3. The President, Kandiyankuppam Village, Velyanpakkam,, Tiruvannamalai Taluk and District.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent to consider petitioner's representation dated 05.05.2014, and initiate appropriate action and pass appropriate order against the respondent for forgery and irregularities committed by the 3rd respondent in withdrawing the village fund. For Petitioner : Mr.R. Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.B. Anand Government Advocate for R1 Mr.Y. Jothish Chander for R2 Ms.P.Rajalakshmi for R3

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that pending writ petition, the 1st respondent / District Collector passed the order in Na.Ka. No.1696/2014/A2, dated 23.02.2015 and nothing survives for adjudication. Further, he https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

has produced a copy of the same order before this Court.

2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and by recording the aforesaid order passed by the 1st respondent, the prayer sought for, has become infructuous and as such, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai.

+1 cc to The Government Pleader, Sr.No. 21538 W.P.No.16411 of 2014 CSL/14.05.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/