Lakshmi Ammal v. Azhagammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 13.08.2018 Coram: The Honourable Ms.Justice P.T.ASHA S.A.Nos.742 & 1130 of 2003 Lakshmi Ammal ...Appellant in both S.As

Versus

1.Azhagammal

...Respondent in S.A.No.742 of 2003

2.Ramasamy Gounder

...Respondent in S.A.No.1130 of 2003

These Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree dated 02.01.2003 and made in A.S.Nos.50 & 51 of 2002 respectively on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Virudhachalam confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.01.2002 and made in O.S.Nos.1271 of 1990 & 258 of 1989 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Virudhachalam.

For Petitioner in both S.As :

Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For sole respondent in both S.As :

Mr.J.Antony Jesus COMMON ORDER Though the sole appellant had died as early as in the year 2010, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is unable to get instructions for impleading the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant. A Memo to this effect has also been filed by the appellant's counsel in both the Second Appeals. Hence, these Second Appeals are dismissed as abated. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Virudhachalam.

2.The Principal District Munsif, Virudhachalam.

S.A.Nos.742 & 1130 of 2003 nrl[co] srg 4/9/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/