Madras High CourtCRL OP/18924/2020dismissed

S.Nagore Kani v. State Rep By

2020-12-02Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.12.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.18924 of 2020 S. Nagore Kani ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Represented by, ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, K8, Arumbakkam Police Station, Arumbakkam, Chennai District.

(Cr.No.950 of 2020) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Connection with the Crime No.950 of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 294 (b), 392 & 506 (ii) of IPC, in Crime No.950 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner by threatening the de-facto complainant robbed a sum of Rs.1000/- at knife point. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that A1 in this case is still in custody. He further submitted that there are two previous cases as against the petitioner herein in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

connection with Cr.Nos.919 of 2020 and 968 of 2020. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and also the fact that there are two previous cases against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 02/12/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K8, ARUMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, ARUMBAKKAM, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to R.C.PAUL KANAGARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.18924/2020 Date :02/12/2020 MN-15/12/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/