Manikandan v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 11.12.2020 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.18606 of 2020 Manikandan ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by its ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, E-3, Teynampet Police Station, Chennai.

Crime No.Not known of 2020.

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner/accused on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest pending investigation in Crime No.Not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saranath For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under section 379 of IPC in Crime No.Not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has been arrested by the respondent police. Hence, this petition has become inftructuous.

3.In view of the above submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

-sd/- 11/12/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-3, TNAMPET POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.P.SARANATH Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.18606/2020 Date :11/12/2020 TA-17/12/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/