← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/1178/2023closed

Kavitha v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2023-07-07Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel9 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.07.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL H.C.P.No.1178 of 2023 Kavitha W/o.Nagarajan .. Petitioner Vs.

1.

The Superintendent of Police District Police Office Perambalur.

2.

The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Perambalur.

3.

Nagarajan 4.

Usha 5.

Dhanarasu ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to direct the second respondent to produce the petitioner's minor child namely, xxxxx son of R.Nagarajan, aged about 1 1/2 years from the custody of the respondents 3 to 5 before this Hon'ble Court and hand over the custody to the petitioner. For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Nagaraju For Respondents :

Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2 Page Nos.1/9

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] Captioned 'Habeas Corpus Petition' [hereinafter 'HCP' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity] is II HCP in this Court as the same petitioner had earlier filed H.C.P.No.783 of 2023 with regard to the same issue and the earlier HCP was withdrawn by the petitioner vide an order dated 04.05.2023 made by another Hon'ble coordinate Bench. A scanned reproduction of the order made by the other Hon'ble coordinate Bench is as follows:

Page Nos.2/9

2. Captioned II HCP has been filed thereafter in this Court on 28.06.2023.

Page Nos.3/9

3. Today, Mr.P.Nagaraju, learned counsel on record for petitioner submits that in I HCP, erstwhile learned counsel on record for petitioner had not made endorsement of withdrawal but we do not propose to go into this arena.

4. Reverting to II HCP on hand, short facts are that the petitioner is married to third respondent (to be noted, third respondent is a private respondent); that the marriage was solemnized on 06.03.2022 (wrongly shown as 06.03.202 in the affidavit); that a male child 'xxxxx' [we are masking the name and we shall be referring to the male child as 'absentee' for the sake of convenience and clarity] was born from the wedlock on 09.11.2021; that there was matrimonial discord between petitioner and third respondent; that third respondent has already filed HMOP No.56 of 2023 on the file of Family Court, Perambalur; that HCP petitioner is the sole respondent in the Family Court, Perambalur; that the proceedings as uploaded in the E-Courts official website shows that this HMOP is next scheduled to be listed on 19.07.2023 for the respondent (HCP petitioner before us) to file counter; that it also shows that two interlocutory Page Nos.4/9

applications have been disposed; that allegation now is, the absentee is in the custody of respondents 3, 4 and 5; that it is submitted that respondents 4 and 5 are close relatives of third respondent; that it is mentioned that respondents 4 and 5 are maternal uncle and aunt of third respondent; that according to the petitioner, custody of the absentee with respondents 3 to 5 is illegal.

5. Issue notice.

6. Mr.E.Raj Thilak, learned State Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for respondents 1 and 2 (official respondents).

7. Learned Prosecutor submitted that the investigation has been kick started and that the same will be pursued with all seriousness in accordance with law by the second respondent.

8. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is scared to go over to the aforementioned family Court in Perambalur and would prefer to seek transfer to a neutral venue.

Page Nos.5/9

9. From the narrative thus far, it comes to light that it is a case of matrimonial discord and a tussle for custody of absentee between two parents. Therefore, we make the following order: (i) Let the second respondent proceed with the investigation in accordance with law and carry it to its logical end;

(ii) All rights of the respondents 3 to 5 qua matrimonial proceedings / custody proceedings, if any are preserved and it is in this context, we dispose of the captioned HCP in the admission board. In other words, rights of the respondents 3 to 5 will not be impacted in any manner by this order and it will stand preserved;

(iii) Let the second respondent produce respondents 3 to 5 and absentee within one week i.e., by 14.07.2023 before learned Judge, Family Court, Thiruchirapalli with advance intimation to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner to present before the Family Court;

(iv) We request learned Judge, Family Court, Thiruchirapalli to record the statements of parties; Page Nos.6/9

(v) As regards HMOP which is already pending, all rights and contentions of petitioner, third respondent or any other party are preserved;

(vi) It is open to the petitioner to seek transfer of HMOP to Thiruchirapalli or any other Court of her convenience and if such transfer plea is made, the Court concerned will consider the same on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this order;

(vii) It is open to the petitioner to initiate proceedings in GAWA Court (to be noted, 'GAWA' stands for 'Guardians and Wards Act, 1890') if so advised and if so desired. If such a course is adopted, GAWA Court shall deal with the matter on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this order;

(viii) Statements recorded by the Family Court, Thiruchirapalli can be used by all parties concerned in appropriate Forum / Fora as regards custody of the absentee or any other proceedings for that matter;

Page Nos.7/9

10. Captioned HCP disposed of as closed with the aforementioned directives.

11. Though the captioned HCP is disposed of, we direct the Registry to list the captioned HCP under the cause list caption 'FOR REPORT' on 18.07.2023 but we make it clear that on 18.07.2023, parties need not be present before this Court and there will be no production of the absentee. (M.S.,J.) (R.S.V.,J.) 07.07.2023 Index : Yes Speaking mk To 1.

The Superintendent of Police District Police Office Perambalur.

2.

The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Perambalur.

3.

The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.

Page Nos.8/9

M.SUNDAR, J., and R.SAKTHIVEL, J., mk H.C.P.No.1178 of 2023 07.07.2023 Page Nos.9/9