Visvanadhan v. The State Rep By Its

Crl.O.P.No.20310 of 2023 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

The Petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the Respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 379 & 430 of IPC r/w. Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation)Act, 1957 in Crime No.187 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the Petitioner transported 3.5 units of pebbles without valid permit from the Government. Hence the complaint.

3.The learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner/A3 is the owner of the vehicle, he is an innocent person and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences and this is the second application for anticipatory bail. Hence, the learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the Respondent would submit that 3.5 units of pebbles were illegally transported by the Petitioner. He is vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.

5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned counsel on either sides and the nature and gravity of the alleged 1/4

offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the Petitioner is directed to make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) directly to the credit of "Chief Minister's Public Relief Fund, Finance (CMPRF) Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009, Indian Overseas Bank, Secretariat Branch, Chennai 600 009, S.B.Account No.11720 10000 00070, IFS Code IOBA0001172, CMPRF PAN: AAAGC0038F", on such deposit and production of proof, the Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannarkoil on condition that the Petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.

[a] the Petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and 2/4

the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the Petitioner shall report before the Respondent Police, on everyday at 10.30 am for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required;

[c] the Petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the Petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

08.09.2023 sai 3/4

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

sai Crl.O.P.No.20310 of 2023 Dated: 08.09.2023 4/4