Suresh Subramani v. The State By

Crl.OP.No.18109 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.18109 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 285, 307 IPC in Crime No.141 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. There are totally five accused in this case, in which the petitioner is arrayed as A2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused persons threw petrol bomb on the defacto complainant and others, due to which the defacto complainant sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that when the defacto complainant was selling https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.18109 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Anu tickets for a movie in black, there arose wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, for which, the petitioner along with other accused threw petrol bomb on the defacto complainant and others, due to which the defacto complainant and others sustained injuries. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

.

5. Considering the fact that the petitioner along with other accused has thrown petrol bomb on the victim and caused injuries, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 03.08.2022 Anu Crl.O.P.No.18109 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis