Madras High CourtWP/18743/2018disposed of with direction

K.Boobalan, v. The Inspector General Of

2025-09-03Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI K.Boobalan ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

2.The Sub Registrar, Periamet, Chennai 600 003.

3.A.Kirubakaran 4.Kumari 5.Komathi 6.Manickam ... Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to cancel the Document No.983 of 2000 dated 17.05.2000 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Periamet, Chennai, in the subject matter of the property at No.1, Old No.10A, Parthasarathy Naidu Street, Pulianthope, Chennai 600 012 after giving the parties notice and also giving personal hearing as claimed in the representation dated 24.08.2017.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mohanamurali For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu for R1 and R2 Additional Government Pleader R3 - No Appearance R4 to R6 - Not Ready Notice

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to cancel Document No.983 of 2000 dated 17.05.2000 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Periamet, Chennai, in the subject matter of the property at No.1, Old No.10A, Parthasarathy Naidu Street, Pulianthope, Chennai 600 012 after giving the parties notice and also giving personal hearing as claimed in the representation dated 24.08.2017. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to cancel Document No.983 of 2000 dated 17.05.2000 on the file of the Sub Registrar Office, Periamet, Chennai, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, may grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court for appropriate remedy.

2/4

3.Considering the limited relief now sought for by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, grants liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent civil Court for appropriate remedy. 4.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 03.09.2025 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

2.The Sub Registrar, Periamet, Chennai 600 003.

3/4

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

pri 03.09.2025 4/4