T.Girijakumari v. District Revenue Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.26615 of 2014 T.GirijaKumari ...

Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Tahsildar Sholinganallur, Chennai Kancheepuram District - 600 119. ...

Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to dispose the petitioner's Appeal dated 24/02/2014 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.R.S.Selvam Nos.1 & 2 Govt.Advocate

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" today i.e. on 09.01.2020. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last hearing i.e., on 03.01.2020, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sms https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Tahsildar Sholinganallur, Chennai Kancheepuram District - 600 119.

+1cc to Government Pleader, SR.No.3166.

W.P.No.26615 of 2014 MR(CO) CSR: 12.02.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/