Prabudoss v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.09.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL.O.P.NO.17350 OF 2021 Prabudoss ... Petitioner

Versus

State rep. by the Inspector of Police, W-32, All Women Police Station, Madipakkam, Chennai - 600 117.

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the Respondent not to harass the petitioner.

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Shahjahan.

For Respondents : Mr.R.Vinoth Raja, Government Advocate (crl.side).

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed not to harass the petitioner.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that in the matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and his wife, the respondent police are constantly harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

3. The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing on behalf of the respondent would submit that since it is a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

matrimonial dispute, the parties were directed to approach the concerned Court and hence, the petitioner is not required for enquiry.

4. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar mrp/mpl To

1. The Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, W-32, All Women Police Station, Madipakkam, Chennai - 600 117.

+2ccs to M/s.M.Shahjahan, Advocate, S.R.No.49679 and 49545 CRL.O.P.No.17350 of 2021 RLD(CO) RLP(22/10/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/