R.Meenachi v. The Inspector Of Panchayat

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 3/1/2023 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR a n d M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2014 R. Meenachi Petitioner in both the writ petitions Vs

1. The Inspector of Panchayat-cum- District Collector

2. The Principal Secretary to Government Rural & Panchayat Raj Department Secretariat Chennai 600 009.

3. The Block Development Officer Panchayat Union (East) Vandavasi

4. The Assistant Director of Panchayats Tiruvannamalai

5. The Tahsildar Vandavasi Respondents in W.P.

No.26680 of 2014 Page No:1/6

a n d

1. The Inspector of Panchayat-cum- District Collector Collectorate

2. The Rural Development Assistant Director (Audit) Office of Collectorate

3. The Tahsildar Vandavasi Taluk Thiruvannamalai District.

Respondents in W.P.No.

30664 of 2014 PRAYER in W.P.No.26680 of 2014: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned notice, dated 20/9/2014 in Na.Ka.No.AA1/85/2014 on the file of the file of the fifth respondent and quash the same.

PRAYER IN W.P.No.30664 of 2014: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned notice, dated 12/11/2014 in Na.Ka.No.AA1/85/2014 on the file of the third respondent and quash the same.

Page No:2/6

For Petitioner ...

Mr.P.Ganapathy No appearance For respondents Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Government Pleader - - - - - C O M M O N O R D E R W.P.No.26680 of 2014 has been filed to quash the impugned notice, dated 20/9/2014, made in Na.Ka.No.AA1/85/2014 passed by the fifth respondent.

W.P.No.30664 of 2014 has been filed to quash the impugned notice, dated 12/11/2014 made in Na.Ka.No.AA1/85/2014 passed by the third respondent.

3. Today, when the matters were taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

4. Heard Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

Page No:3/6

5. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that these writ petitions were challenged for the removal of President, in the year 2014. Now, the period is also over and subsequent elections were also conducted. Hence nothing survives for further adjudication.

6. Submission of the learned Additional Government Pleader is recorded.

7. In view of the above, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous, as nothing survives for further adjudication. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 3/1/2023 mvs.

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order Page No:4/6

To

1. The Inspector of Panchayat-cum-District Collector

2. The Principal Secretary to Government Rural & Panchayat Raj Department Secretariat Chennai 600 009.

3. The Block Development Officer Panchayat Union (East) Vandavasi

4. The Assistant Director of Panchayats Tiruvannamalai

5. The Tahsildar Vandavasi

6. The Rural Development Assistant Director (Audit) Office of Collectorate Page No:5/6

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J mvs.

W.P.Nos.26680 and 30664 of 2014 3/1/2023 Page No:6/6