A.Murugan v. K.Bala Venkatesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.03.2025 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A.Murugan .
... Plaintiff vs.
1.K.Bala Venkatesh 2.B.B.Vetrivelar ... Defendants Prayer : Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 & 2 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of CPC to pass decree and Judgment against the defendants as hereunder:- a) For recovery of a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs Only) paid with future interest at 18% p.a. on monthly rests from the date of plaint till the date of realization. b) For recovery of a sum of Rs.2,55,94,330 from the defendants as compensation payable by the defendants to the plaintiff for the improvements made to the suit schedule property with interest @ 12 per annum from the date of plaint till the date of realization; c)For a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their 1/6
men, servants or agents or anyone claiming under them from in any manner interfering with the peaceful running of the Hotel Business carried on under the name and style of M/s.Alagar Mess and Lodging House situate at Door No.77, Parthasazrathipuram 1st Street, Off North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017, morefully described in the suit schedule property; d)For a permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their men, servants or agents or anyone claiming under them from in any manner interfering with the amenities enjoyed by the plaintiff in respect of the suit premises situate at Door No77, Parthasarathipuram 1st Street, Off North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017, such a power Supply, water and sewerage connection and other amenities provided in the premises except in accordance with law;
e) Granting such further or other reliefs, as this Court may deed fit and proper in the circumstances.
f) Cost of the suit.
For Plaintiff : Mr.Ramana Reddy For defendants : Mr.K.Subbu Ranga Bharathi 2/6
J U D G M E N T
This suit has been filed by the plaintiff for recovery of money from the defendants and permanent injunction restraining the defendants not to disturb the peaceful running of the business.
2. A Mediation Report had been received from the Mediation Center along with a Joint Memo of Compromise filed by the parties jointly indicating that the parties have settled the dispute among themselves and the said memo has been acknowledged by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties.
3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties on terms of Memo of Compromise, no further adjudication is required to be made in the Suit and accordingly, the Suit is disposed of in terms of the Joint Memo of Compromise entered into between the parties. The said Joint Memo of Compromise shall form a part of this judgments and the same is also annexed to this judgment .
4. Registry is directed to refund the court fee paid by the plaintiff. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications are closed.
3/6
07.03.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet :Yes / No Gba 4/6
K.KUMARESH BABU.J., Gba 5/6
07.03.2025 6/6