Tamizhvanan v. The Inspector Of Police

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.

J.

The petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7, Tamizhvanan, Dharmaraj, Karunanithi, Pavunammal, Lakshmi@Dhanalakshmi, Rani and Ganesan, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 341, 294 (b), 353 & 323 IPC, in Crime No.251 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that petitioners are falsely implicated as accused in this case. Fourth accused Pavunammal was arrested and released on bail. Apprehending arrest, this petition is filed.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that defacto complainant is a Senior Bailiff working in Perambalur District Court. He was entrusted with the job of delivering the property in respect E.P.No.46 of 2014 of Sub Court, Perambalur. Property situated in S.F.No.192/3 to an extent of 36 cents and S.F.No.192/9 to an extent of

78 cents, totally, an extent of 1 acre and 14 cents. As per the Court's warrant, he visited the suit property at about 11.45 a.m., along with VAO and police officials. When he was inspecting the property, accused had scolded the plaintiff in filthy language and slapped him on his cheeks. Pavunammal poured kerosene on her body and restrained him from doing his duty. Other accused scolded him in filthy language and restrained him from performing his duty as a public servant. 4.Considering the nature of the allegations made against the petitioners that they prevented the public servant, namely, the Court official from discharging his duties, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed.

17.07.2023 sli

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.

J.

sli 17.07.2023