Raseena v. Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd., Rep

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.09.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.10963 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.12868 of 2004

1. Raseena,

2. H.U.Saleem, ... Petitioners vs.

Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Pondicherry Branch, No.201/203, Mission Street, Pondicherry 605 001.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, direction in the nature of writ forbearing the respondent, their subordinate officials from acting pursuant to the notice in No.48/2002 under Sec. 13(2) of Securitization Act, dated 21.12.2002.

For Petitioner :

Ms.Usha Ramman for Mr.R.Hariharan For Respondent :

Mr.T.K.Seshadri

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the dispute has been settled between the parties. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. 2.The Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS V ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To:

+1cc to Mr.Usha Ramman, Advocate sr.70178 order in W.P.No.10963 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.12868 of 2004 ss(13/10/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/