← Library
Madras High CourtCMA/2653/2024partly allowed

K.Saiyath Batcha v. P .Poopandi

2025-07-15Honourable Mrs.Justice T.V.Thamilselvi8 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15-07-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI K.Saiyath Batcha Appellant Vs

1. P .Poopandi 2.The Managing Director Tamil Nadu Sstate Transport Corporation, No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-43 Respondents PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Sec.173 of Motor Vehicle Act, praying to enhance the compensation awarded in the Fair and Decretal order dated 07.02.2023 passed in MCOP No.123 of 2022 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Subordinate Judge Court, at Erode). 1/8

For Appellant:

Mr.M. Mohamed Riyaz For Respondents:

Mr.M.Murali Vinodh For R2 R1 - Unclaimed

JUDGMENT

The petitioner not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in MCOP No.123 of 2022, dated 07.02.2023 has preferred this appeal seeking for enhancement of compensation. 2.The case of the petitioner is that on 17.12.2021 at about 04.00 hours, when the petitioner stopped his ambulance bearing Regn. No. TN-59 Q-3758 on the Erode EVN Road near Poorna Mess at the extreme left side, waiting for patient shifting from Government Hospital, Erode to Coimbatore, at that time, a bus bearing Regn. No. TN-39-N-0420 driven by its driver from south to north direction in a rash and negligent manner, dashed from behind the stationery ambulance. Due to which, the petitioner sustained multiple bone fractures and grievous injuries, for which he underwent treatment in the hospital. Under these circumstances, the claim petition came to be filed before the Tribunal seeking for payment of compensation of Rs.1,00,00,000/-. 2/8

3.The Tribunal on considering the facts and circumstances of the case and on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, came to a conclusion that the accident had taken place only due to the rash and negligent driving on the part of the rider of the 1 st respondent. Having come to such a conclusion, the Tribunal fixed the total compensation payable at Rs.34,55,000/- under various heads as follows:

S.No Compensation awarded under the head Amount (in Rs.) 1.

Loss of earning nil 2.

Transport to hospital 50,000 3.

Extra nourishment 70,000 4.

Attender charges 90,000 5.

Future medical expenses 1,00,000 6.

Damages for clots and articles 13,000 7.

Medical expenses 5,56,000 8.

Pain and sufferings 2,00,000 9.

Permanent disability and loss of earning power 23,76,000 Total 34,55,000 4.The above compensation was directed to be paid with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum.

3/8

5.The appellant not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal has filed the present appeal before this Court seeking for enhancement of compensation.

6. The learned counsel for appellant would submit that the appellant preferred this appeal in respect of fixation of notional income of injured/appellant only stating that at the time of accident, he was a driver of Ambulance and he sustained spinal card injury. Therefore, considering the disability, the tribunal had applied the multiplier, but while fixing the notional income, the tribunal fixed only a sum of Rs.15,000/- without taking into consideration of the fact that the accident was happened in the year 2021. Hence, he prayed to enhance the compensation.

7. The learned counsel for 2 nd respondent would submit that at the time of accident, he was only a driver of Sun Ambulance, but he has not produced any documentary evidence for the income derived by him at Rs.25,000/-. Hence, the tribunal has rightly fixed the monthly income of the petitioner, which needs no interference of this court.

4/8

8. Heard and considered rival submissions made by both learned counsel for appellant as well as 2 nd respondent and perused materials available on record.

9. Considering both side submissions, the fact reveals that admittedly, he is a driver of Sun Ambulance and the accident was happened in the year 2021 and he was aged about 52 years at the time of accident. Therefore, considering his age as well as considering the cost of living at that time, this Court is inclined to enhance the notional monthly income from Rs.15,000/- per month to Rs.20,000/- per month. The compensation that has been fixed under the other heads are reasonable and does not require the interference of this Court. 10.In the light of the above discussion, the compensation awarded by the tribunal is modified as follows:

5/8

S.No Compensation awarded under the head Amount awarded by the tribunal (in Rs.) Amount (in Rs.) Amount confirmed or granted or enhanced 1.

Permanent Disability/loss of earning power Rs.20,000/- (add 20% future prospects) =20000 + 4000 = 24000 24000 x 12 x 11 (multiplier) x 100% = Rs.31,68,000/- 23,76,000 31,68,000 enhanced 2.

Transport to hospital 50,000 50,000 confirmed 3.

Extra nourishment 70,000 70,000 confirmed 4.

Attender charges 90,000 90,000 confirmed 5.

Future medical expenses 1,00,000 1,00,000 confirmed 6.

Damages for cloths and articles 13,000 13,000 confirmed 7.

Medical expenses 5,56,000 5,56,000 confirmed 8.

Pain and sufferings 2,00,000 2,00,000 confirmed 9.

Loss of earnings nil nil Total 34,55,000 42,47,000 11.The compensation awarded by the tribunal at Rs.34,55,000/- is enhanced to Rs.42,47,000/-. The second respondent transport corporation is directed to deposit the enhanced compensation, less the amount already deposited, together with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of claim petition till the date of deposit within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of 6/8

copy of this judgment. On such deposit, the appellant is permitted to withdraw the enhanced award amount along with interest and costs, less the amount if any, already withdrawn. Insofar as the enhanced compensation is concerned, the deficit court fee, if not paid, shall be paid by the petitioner. The other directions issued by the Tribunal with regard to the mode of payment of compensation remains unaltered.

12.In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed. No costs.

15-07-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes rpp To

1. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Subordinate Judge Court, Erode.

2. Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court. 7/8

T.V.THAMILSELVI J.

rpp 15-07-2025 8/8