A.N.Subramanyan v. The State Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.08.2021

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN WP.Nos.1878 & 1879 of 2014 and MP.Nos.2 & 2 of 2014 and WP.No.2525 of 2014 & MP.No.2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.2014 to 2017 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.7739 to 7753 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 & MP.Nos.3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 of 2014 and WP.Nos.35589 to 35591 of 2015 and 36389 & 36390 of 2015 and MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2 of 2015 and WP.No.7998 of 2015 and WP.Nos.13577 to 13587 of 2014 & MP.Nos.3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.26981 to 26983 of 2014, 21185 to 21191 of 2014, 9933 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.22944 to 22951 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.24262 to 24267 of 2015 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2015 & WMP.Nos.6761 to 6765 of 2016 and WP.Nos.5198 to 5206 of 2014 & MP.Nos.

2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 A.N.SUBRAMANYAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.1878 of 2014 R.VEDAVALLI ... PETITIONER in WP No.1879 of 2014 1.S.RENGANATHAN 2.R.SOMASUNDARI ...PETITIONERS in WP No.2525 of 2014 R.U.GEETHA ... PETITIONERS in WP No.2014 of 2014 R.SIVAGAMI ... PETITIONER in WP No.2015 of 2014 L.KRISHNAKUMAR ... PETITIONER in WP No.2016 of 2014 G.C.KRISHNAKUMAR ... PETITIONER in WP No.2017 of 2014 R.KAMALA ... PETITIONER in WP No.7739 of 2014 D.JEGADEESAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.7740 of 2014 V.ISABELL RAFEEDA ... PETITIONER in WP No.7741 of 2014 Mr.MURALIDHARAN RAMAMURTHY ... PETITIONER in WP No.

G.VASANTHAVAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.7743 of 2014 N.MEENAKSHI ... PETITIONER in WP No.7744 of 2014 N.KALYANI ... PETITIONER in WP No.7745 of 2014 N.REVATHI NATARAJAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.7746 of 2014 R.UMAMAHESWARI ... PETITIONER in WP No.7747 of 2014 S.SHIVSHANKAR ... PETITIONER in WP No.7748 of 2014 DR.PADMINI SREENIVASAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.7749 of 2014 G.SHARADA ... PETITIONER in WP No.7750 of 2014 T.S.SREENIVASAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.7751 of 2014 K.BALAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.7752 of 2014 Mrs.MAHALAKSHMI ... PETITIONER in WP No.7753 of 2014 ANTHONY THOMAS ... PETITIONER in WP No.35589 of 2015 MRS. N.ANBUKKARASI ... PETITIONER in WP No.35590 of 2015 Mrs.GEETHA GANAPATHY SUBRAMANIAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.35591 of 2015 1.MRS. B.LAKSHMI MANOHARAMMA 2.MR. T.THANGAVEL ... PETITIONERS in WP No.36389 of 2015 1.DR. K.RAMUDU 2.

MRS. ARULANANTAM ...PETITIONERS in WP No.36390 of 2015 S.VICTOR RAJ PANDIAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.7998 of 2015 K.KANNAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.13577 of 2014 MR.NIRMALA JAYASEELAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.13578 of 2014 MR.M.L.POPLI ... PETITIONER in WP No.13579 of 2014 MR.V.VASANTHA ... PETITIONER in WP No.13580 of 2014 MR.K.PURUSHOTHAMAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.

MR.LAKSHMI NARASIMHAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.13582 of 2014 K.R.KRISHNAMOORTHY ... PETITIONER in WP No.13583 of 2014 S.BALAJI ... PETITIONER in WP No.13584 of 2014 K.VIDHYA RAMAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.13585 of 2014 S.BHUVANESWARI ... PETITIONER in WP No.13586 of 2014 S.BALAJI ... PETITIONER in WP No.13587 of 2014 P.MANICKAM ... PETITIONER in WP No.26981 of 2014 T.A.SURENDRAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.26982 of 2014 VENKATESH JAYADEV ... PETITIONER in WP No.26983 of 2014 M.SUMITHRA ... PETITIONER in WP No.21185 of 2014 M.VIJAYALAKSHMI ... PETITIONER in WP No.21186 of 2014 R.VIJAYA SARAVANAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.21187 of 2014 MRS.VIJAYALAKSHMI NARASIMHAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.21188 of 2014 A.S.RAMANATHAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.21189 of 2014 M.PARVEZ ... PETITIONER in WP No.21190 of 2014 A.SELVARAJ ... PETITIONER in WP No.

21191 of 2014 M.SUMITHRA ... PETITIONER in WP No.21185 of 2014 1.MRS. SUPRIYA HOON 2.T.V.PRASAD ... PETITIONERS in WP No.9933 of 2014 MRS.JOYCE CARALINE DHARMARAJA ... PETITIONER in WP No.22944 of 2014 1.P.RAMAKRISHNAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.22945 of 2014 1.S.SRIDHAR 2.S.VIJAYALAKSHMI 3.R.PALANI ...PETITIONERS in WP No.

1.K.UMA 2.N.SAMBURNAM ...PETITIONERS in WP No.22947 of 2014 O.MOHAN KRISHNA ... PETITIONER in WP No.22948 of 2014 B.USEN SHERIEF ... PETITIONER in WP No.22949 of 2014 D.K.JOSHI ... PETITIONER in WP No.22950 of 2014 MR. STANLEY KURUVILLA JOSHUA ... PETITIONER in WP No.22951 of 2014 1.J.A.MANOHAR 2.MRS.N.SUBASHINI ... PETITIONER in WP No.22262 of 2014 SNEHAL RAJA ... PETITIONER in WP No.24263 of 2015 B.VIMALA ... PETITIONER in WP No.24264 of 2015 V.RANGARAJAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.24265 of 2015 MRS.PREMA NAGARAJAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.24266 of 2015 MR.P.I.SUNNY ... PETITIONER in WP No.24267 of 2015 MRS.SHANTHI ... PETITIONER in WP No.5198 of 2014 MRS.MALLIKA RAMANAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.5199 of 2014 MR.N.SUNDARA RAJAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.5200 of 2014 MR.SHRIKANT DHONDIRAM KATKE ... PETITIONER in WP No.5201 of 2014 A.N.

SUBRAMANYAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.5202 of 2014 C.SADANANDAM ... PETITIONER in WP No.5203 of 2014 V.CHANDRASEKARAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.5204 of 2014 K.SHANTHI ... PETITIONER in WP No.5205 of 2014 V.CHANDRASEKARAN ... PETITIONER in WP No.5206 of 2014 Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary.

Department of Industries, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 .. Respondent 1 in WP.No.35589, 36389, 36390 of 2015 & 7998/2015, 26981, 26983 of 2014 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Addl.Chief Secretary Department of Industries, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 ... Respondent 1 in WP.No.35590, 35591/2015 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Industries, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram ....Respondents in All WP's 3.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Unit-2, SIPCOT, Oragadam Expansion Scheme-II, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

Respondent 3 in WP.Nos.7739/2014 to 7752 of 2014, 35589, 35590, 35591, 36389, 36390, 7998 of 2015, 13577 to 13587 of 2014 26981, 26982, 21185, 21186, 21187, 21188, 21189, 21190, 21191 of 2014 22944, 22947, 22948, 22949, of 2014 24264 to 24267 of 2015, 5198 to 5206 of 2014 3.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Unit-3, SIPCOT, Sriperumbudur Expansion Scheme-II, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District 4.The Managing Director, SIPCOT Unit-III, Sriperumbudur Expansion Scheme, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai-600 008

...Respondents

in WP.No.1878, 1879, 2525, 2015, 2016, 2017, 7753, 26983, 9933 , 22945, 22946, 22950, 22951 of 2014 in all WPS. 5.The Special District

Revenue Officer (LA), Irugattukottai, Sriperumbudur.

..5th Respondent in WP.2014 of 2014 5.The Sub Registrar office of the Sub-Registrar Sunguvarchattram.

5th Respondent in WP.22946 of 2014 WP No.1878 of 2014 mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.114, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.78 Comprised in Survey No.

320/2A1 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.7/2009 Unit II dated 02.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.1879 of 2014 mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.967 Comprised in Survey Nos.316/1A and 317/1 measuring to an extent of 1800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.2525 of 2014 mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.115, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.149, Comprised in Survey No.328/1A,1A measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.2014 of 2014 & WP No.2014 of 2014:

mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.115, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.140, 239, 186, 187, 327 comprised in Survey No.

328/1A, 1A, 327, 328/1A, 1A, 329/1, 330 and 331, 323/1 and 324 measuring to an extent of 2400, 2400, 4800, 1500, square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential Notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.8/2009 Unit II dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7739 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.112, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of

Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.619 comprised in Survey No.65/1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7740 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.942 comprised in Survey No.

316/1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7741 of 2014 mandamus Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.779 comprised in Survey No.311/1A1 measuring to an

extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.7742 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.

113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.761, 762, 777 and 778 comprised in Survey No.311/1A1 & 311/2 measuring to an extent of 14400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.

2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7743 of 2014 Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.948 comprised in Survey No.306/3A1 measuring to an extent of 2700 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated

24.11.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7744 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.1008 comprised in Survey No.

315/2A1 measuring to an extent of 1800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.7745 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), 04.06.

2012 on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Subsection (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.1007 comprised in Survey No.315/2A1 & 316/1A measuring to an extent of 1800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.

2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7746 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), 04.06.2012 on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Subsection (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.1006 comprised in Survey No.

316/1A measuring to an extent of 1800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.7747 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.

112, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.458 comprised in Survey No.59/3 measuring to an extent of 2800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.

2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7748 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.112, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of

Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.457 comprised in Survey No.59/3 measuring to an extent of 2800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7749 of 2014 Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.764 comprised in Survey No.

311/1B measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamil nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7750 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.751 comprised in Survey No.310/1A1 & 311/1B measuring

to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.7751 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.

113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.763 comprised in Survey No.311/1B measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.11.

2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7752 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.114, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.323 comprised in Survey No.323/1 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.7/2009 Unit II dated 02.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to

conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.7753 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.159, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.447- Part II - Section 2 dt 29.11.2011 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.518 comprised in Survey No.

175/9 measuring to an extent of 1800 square feet in 180, Vadaal B Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.19/2010 dated 15.02.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, in the 1st week of April 2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.35589 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.114, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section(1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section 2, dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.81 Comprised in Survey No.320/2A1 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in No.180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential order of the 3rd respondent in his proceedings in RC.No.7/2009 Unit II dated 02.01.2014 and quash the same.

WP No.35590 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.88, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section(1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial

Purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.92-Part-II-Section 2, dated 20.04.2015 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.31 Comprised in Survey No.51/1A1A measuring to an extent of 1180 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential order of the third respondent in his proceedings in RC.No.2/2009 Unit II dated 28.05.2015, under section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial purpose Act 1997 and quash the Same. WP No.35591 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.

88, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section(1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.92-Part-II-Section 2, dated 20.04.2015 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.67 Comprised in Survey No.51/1A2 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential order of the third respondent in his proceedings in RC.No.2/2009 Unit II dated 28.05.2015, under section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial purpose Act 1997 and quash the Same. WP No.

36389 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for industrial Purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section2 dated 04-06-2012 relating to the property schedule therin and in so far as the 2nd petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.776 comprised in Survey No.311/1B measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet situated at No.28, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same. WP No.36390 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.

Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for industrial Purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section2 dated 04-06-2012 relating to the property schedule therin and in so far as the 2nd petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.711, comprised in Survey No.68/2 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in No.180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur taluk, Kancheepuram District.

WP No.7998 of 2015 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) dated 4.6.2012 on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act,1997 published in the Tamilnadu Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.301 (Prayer amended as per order dt.27.7.18 by SMSJ IN WMP.36905/16 IN WP.7998/15) comprised in Survey No.59/2 and 59/4A, 1A measuring to an extent of 2800 sq.

feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same. WP No.13577 of 2014 & WP No.13578 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.

2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.607, 469, Comprised in Survey No.64/2A, 59/3, measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13579 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.480, Comprised in Survey No.

61/1B1, measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13580 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.536, Comprised in Survey No.62/1, measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4

(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13581 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the

file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.566 & 567, Comprised in Survey No.63/3A, measuring to an extent of 4800 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13582 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.914, Comprised in Survey No.

306/3A1, measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13583 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in

Plot No.765, Comprised in Survey No.311/1B, measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13584 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.843, Comprised in Survey No.

313/2A, measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13585 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.844, Comprised in Survey No.313/2A, measuring to an extent of 2580 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st

respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13586 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.861, Comprised in Survey No.

313/6, measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.13587 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.643, Comprised in Survey No.

65/3A1, measuring to an extent of 2800 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential notice under section 4(2) of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.26981 of 2014

mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act,1997 published in the Tamilnadu Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.299 comprised in Survey No.59/4A, 1A measuring to an extent of 2800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.26982 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.115, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act,1997 published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.173 & 174 comprised in Survey No.328/1A,1A measuring to an extent of 4800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.

2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.26983 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.156, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act,1997 published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.447-Part-II-Section 2 dated 29.11.2011 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.85 comprised in Survey Nos.142/5A1 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 121, Vadagal B Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation, dated 30.04.2011 by

furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.21186 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.114, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.152, comprised in Survey No.328/1A1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential Notice under Section 4

(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.8/2009 Unit II dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.21187 of 2014 & WP.No.22944 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.990, 750, comprised in Survey No.

315/1, 310/2 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential Notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.21188 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.

file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.21, comprised in Survey No.320/1A1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential Notice under Section 4

(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.7/2009 Unit II dated 02.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.21189 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.923, comprised in Survey No.316/1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential Notice under Section 4

(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.6/2009 Unit II dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.21190 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot

No.602 & 605, comprised in Survey No.63/4B & 64/2A measuring to an extent of 4800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential Notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.5/2009 Unit II dated 10.02.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.21191 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.

71, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.119-Part II Section 2 dated 13.06.2014 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.18, comprised in Survey No.

(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.12/2009 Unit II dated 25.06.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 07.09.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.21185 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.114, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.111 & 112, comprised in Survey No.321/2 measuring to an extent of 4000 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and consequential Notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.7/2009 Unit II dated 02.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the

1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.9933 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining ot the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.NO.115, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st Respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Government Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.309, comprised in Survey No.

324 measuring to an extent of 7320 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Tk, Kancheepuram Dt and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.22944 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) dated 29.11.2011, on the file of the 1st respondent issued under SubSection (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149 Part-II Section 2 dated 04.06.

2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.750, comprised in Survey No.310/2, measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential Form-E Notice in R.C.No.6 of 2009 dated 24.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing to the Petitioner as per the representation in, dated 26.05.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4.

WP No.22945 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.155, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) dated 29.11.2011, on the file of the 1st respondent issued under SubSection (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.447 Part-II Section 2 dated

29.11.2011 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.200 & 286, comprised in Survey No.165/4A1, measuring to an extent of 1800 square feet in Vadakal Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential Form-E Notice in R.C.No.21 of 2010 dated 18.02.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing to the Petitioner as per the representation in, dated 26.05.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4.

WP No.22946 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, 112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) dated 04.06.2012, on the file of the 1st respondent issued under SubSection (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149 Part-II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.750, 648, comprised in Survey No.310/2, 66/3A1 measuring to an extent of 2400, 2800 square feet in Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing of the petitioner as per the representation dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4.

WP No.22947 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.114, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149 Part-II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.82, comprised in Survey No.320/2A1 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.22948 of 2014

mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.113, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149 Part-II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.963, comprised in Survey No.305 measuring to an extent of 2700 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.

2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.22949 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.115, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149 Part-II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.167, comprised in Survey No.

328,1A,1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.22950 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.115, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) dt. 04.06.2012, on the file of the 1st respondent issued under SubSection (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149 Part-II Section 2 dated 04.06.

2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.234, comprised in Survey No.

hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.22951 of 2014 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.114, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) dt. 04.06.2012, on the file of the 1st respondent issued under SubSection (1) of Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149 Part-II Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioner property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.379, comprised in Survey No.318/1 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.

2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP.24262 of 2015 & WP No.24263 of 2015 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.114, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.55, 405, Comprised in Survey No.320/1A, 318/1 measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same. WP No.

24264 of 2015 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.112, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II- Section 2 dated 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.225, Comprised in Survey No.

Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same. WP No.24265 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.88, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.92-Part-II- Section 2 dated 20.04.2015 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.12 Comprised in Survey No.50/1A1A measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same.

WP No.24266 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.88, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.92-Part-II- Section 2 dated 20.04.2015 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.118 Comprised in Survey No.51/1A1A measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same. WP No.24267 of 2015 mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms.No.

88, Industries (SIPCOT-LA) on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub Section (1) of section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of land for industrial purposes Act, 1997, Published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazettte Extraordinary No.92-Part-II- Section 2 dated 20.04.2015 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.127 Comprised in Survey No.51/1A1A measuring to an extent of 2400 Square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same. WP.No.5198 of 2014 & WP No.

mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.115, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.263, 264 Comprised in Survey Nos.327 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under Section 4 (2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.

No.8/2009 Unit II dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.5200 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.114, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.394 Comprised in Survey No.

318/1 measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.8/2009 Unit II dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.5201 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.114, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012

relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot Nos. 370, 371 and 372, Comprised in Survey Nos. 318/1, 319/1A and 320/1A1A measuring to an extent of 7200 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.8/2009 Unit II dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.5202 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.114, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot Nos. 68 and 69 Comprised in Survey No.

320/2A1 measuring to an extent of 4800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and the consequential notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purpose Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd Respondent in their proceeding in RC.No.8/2009 Unit II dated 16.12.2013 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.5203 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.

113 & 114, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.781 in Survey No.311/2 & Plot No.83 in Survey No.

quash the same the consequently direct the 1st Respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.5204 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.113, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.1017 & 1018 comprised in Survey No.316/1A measuring to an extent of 4800 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same the consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him.

WP No.5205 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.112, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.254, in Survey No.59/4A, 1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.

2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. WP No.5206 of 2014 mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Acquisition Notification in G.O.Ms. No.112, Industries (SIPCOT - LA), on the file of the 1st respondent issued under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette Extraordinary No.149- Part II - Section 2 dt 4.6.

relating to the property schedule therein and in so far as the petitioners property is concerned, being the housing site in Plot No.253, in Survey No.59/4A, 1A measuring to an extent of 2400 square feet in 180, Mathur Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.02.2010 by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to him. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Raja Sekhar For Respondents For R1 to 3 : Mr.Richardson Wilson, Government Advocate For R4 : M/s.Sudarshana Sunder COMMON ORDER All the Writ Petitions are filed to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the acquisition notification in GO.Ms.No.

114 Industries (SIPCOTLA), on the file of the first respondent issued under subsection (1) of section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997, published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazatte Extraordinary No.149-Part-II-Section 2 dated 04.06.2012 relating to the property schedule therein and insofar the petitioners' properties are concerned and the consequential notice under Section 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (Act 10 of 1999) issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents in their proceedings in Rc.No.7/2009 Unit II dated 02.01.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation of the petitioners by furnishing the report of the respondents 3 and 4 to them.

2. The petitioners in all the writ petitions have purchased their respective house plots by the registered sale deed (hereinafter called as 'subject property'). The first respondent intended to acquire the subject property for industrial purpose, to wit, for expansion of SIPCOT, Sriperumbudur Expansion Scheme-II under the Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (Tamilnadu Act 10 of 1999) (hereinafter called as 'the Act'). The first respondent by the GO.Ms.No.2 Industries (SIPCOT-LA) Department dated 06.01.2009 have accorded administrative sanction for the acquisition of 173.25.5 hectares of patta dry lands and alienation of 76.26.0 hectares of poramboke lands in Vaipur, Perinjambakkam and Mathur villages of Sriperumbudur Taluk for the Expansion of SIPCOT, Oragadam Industrial Growth Centre Expansion-II. According to the petitioners, they were not issued

notice as contemplated under Section 14 ( c) of the Act. In pursuant to the acquisition proceedings, the second respondent issued show cause notice through paper publication as contemplated under Section 3 (2) of the Act. On receipt of the same, the petitioners raised their objections stating that the respective properties needed for constructing residential houses. Without considering the objections raised by the petitioners, and without conducting any enquiry, the first respondent issued notification under Section 3 (1) of the Act by respective Government orders and published in the Tamilnadu Government Gazette. The respondents also did not follow the procedure contemplated under Section 3 (2) and (3) of the Act.

They did not conduct any enquiry on the objections raised by the petitioners as contemplated under Rule 6 (b) and (c ) of the Act. Therefore, challenging the notification issued under Section 3 (1) of the Act and also consequential notice issued under Section 4 (2) of the Act and consequentially for direction directing the first respondent to conduct personal hearing as per the representation submitted by the petitioners, the writ petitions have been filed.

3. The second respondent filed counter and stated that the Government in their GO.Ms.No.2 Industries (SIPCOT-LA) Department dated 06.01.2009 have accorded the administrative sanction for the acquisition of 173.25.5 hectares of patta dry lands and alienation of 76.26.0 hectares of poramboke lands in Vaipur, Perinjambakkam and Mathur Villages of Sriperumbudur Taluk, for the expansion of SIPCOT, Oragadam Industrial Growth Centre Expansion-II. Accordingly to an extent of 14.70.5 hectares of dry lands in Unit-II, Block-III, comprising survey Nos.59, 60, 61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,71,72,73 and 74 of Mathur Village were notified for the acquisition under Section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (The Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999) by the second respondent in his reference Na.Ka.No.5/2009, dated 10.12.2009.

As contemplated under Section 3 (2) of the Act, Form A were sent to all the petitioners through registered post with acknowledgement due. The notification in Form B published in two dailies, thereby called upon the objections from the persons aggrieved of the acquisition. All the objections raised by the respective petitioners referred to fourth respondent who is the requisitioning body and obtained their remarks. Thereafter, the second respondent conducted enquiry and heard all the objections. In fact, on receipt of the notice under Form A, some of the petitioners failed to raise any objections and also failed to appear for the enquiry conducted by the second respondent. Only thereafter, the notification was issued under Section 3 (1) of the Act by the impugned GO's.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners raised the

following grounds:

(a) The impugned notification issued under Section 3 (1) of the Act is contrary to the provisions as contemplated under Sections 3 (2) and

(3) of the Act read with Rule 6 (b) & (c ) of the Act.

(b) The second respondent has no authority or jurisdiction to hear the objections.

(c ) The first respondent cannot delegate the power to the second respondent and it clearly mandates that the first respondent before passing the order under Section 3 (1) of the Act, it should hear and consider the cause if any shown by the owner or the person interested.

(d) Section 3 (2) and (3) of the Act read with Rule 6 (b) and ( c) of the Act confer valuable right in favour of the respective petitioners whose land is sought to be acquired and having regard to the provisions contained under Article 300 A of the Constitution of India in exercise of their power of eminent domain may interfere with the right to the property of a person strictly in conformity with the procedure established by law.

The learned counsel for the petitioners also relied upon the judgment in the case of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Darius Shapur Chenai reported in (2005) 7 SCC 627.

5. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate Mr.Richardson Wilson submitted that the Government have delegated the power to the second respondent and the same is proper and valid as per section 23 A of the Act. Therefore, the entire proceedings initiated by the respondents are proper and valid. There are provisions to authorise the second respondent to hear objections by the first respondent under the Act. The first respondent passed orders based on the records placed and the enquiry conducted by the second respondent and after applying their mind, the orders were passed as per the provisions contemplated under the Act. Therefore, there is no violation of Article 300 A of the Constitution of India. In support of his contention, he relied upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Secretary to Government Vs. M/s.V.G.P. Housing Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Director, Chennai in WA.No.1710 of 2017 dated 01.02.2018 and also the judgment in the case of N.Murugan Vs. District Collector, Kancheepuram reported in (2014) 5 LW 385.

6. Heard, Mr.M.Raja Sekhar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.Richardson Wilson, Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, and M/s.Sudarshana Sunder, learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent.

7. The Government in their GO.Ms.No.2 Industries (SIPCOTLA) Department dated 06.01.2009 have accorded the administrative sanction for the acquisition of 173.25.5 hectares of patta dry lands and alienation of 76.26.0 hectares of poramboke lands in Vaipur, Perinjambakkam and Mathur Villages of Sriperumbudur Taluk, for the expansion of SIPCOT, Oragadam Industrial Growth Centre Expansion-II. Accordingly, to an extent of 14.70.5 hectares of dry lands in Unit-II, Block-III, comprising in survey Nos.59, 60, 61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,71,72,73 and 74 of Mathur Village were notified for the acquisition under section 3

(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Lands for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (The Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999) by the second respondent in his reference Na.Ka.No.5/2009, dated 10.12.2009. In pursuant to the Government order, the petitioners were issued notice under Section 3 (2) of the Act. All the petitioners were duly served notice and some of the petitioners filed their objections and some of the petitioners failed to raise any objection. All the objections raised by the petitioners were referred to the fourth respondent who is being requisitioning body. After obtaining opinion from the requisitioning body, the second respondent conducted enquiry on 12.02.2010. In the enquiry, some of the petitioners appeared and some of the petitioners did not appear before the enquiry conducted by the second respondent. Thereafter, the impugned notification was issued by the first respondent as contemplated under Section (3)

(1) of the Act.

8. In all these writ petitions, the points for consideration are as follows:

(i) Whether the District Collector has power to conduct enquiry on the objections raised by the petitioners as contemplated under Section 3 (2) and

(3) of the Act read with Rule 6 (b) and (c ) of the Act.

(ii) If the second respondent is empowered to conduct enquiry, whether the second respondent followed the procedure as contemplated under Section 3 (2) read with Rule 6 (b) and (c ) of the Act.

9. The first point raised by the learned counsel for the petitioners have already been settled by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Secretary to Government Vs. M/s.V.G.P. Housing Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Director, Chennai in WA.No.1710 of 2017 dated 01.02.2018, wherein this Court held as follows:

8. The Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 is a self contained code providing for acquisition of land for industrial purposes in the State. The State legislature enacted

Tamil Nadu Act 10 of 1999 for speedy acquisition of land for industrial purposes. The Act contained a summary procedure for conducting enquiry and to take a decision as to whether the particular land is required for the industrial purpose.

9. Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the Industrial Purposes Act provides that the Government shall issue notice calling upon the land owners to show cause as to why the land should not be acquired. The objection received from the land owners must be considered before issuing the notification for acquisition under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Industrial Purposes Act. Section 4 provides that when a notice under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 is published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, the land to which the said notice relates shall, on and from the date of such publication, vest absolutely with the Government free from all encumbrances. There are other provisions relating to determination of land value, apportionment and reference to the Court either for apportionment, in case, there is a dispute with regard to entitlement or a claim for enhancement.

10. Section 23-A of the Industrial Purposes Act deals with delegation of powers. The said provision reads thus:- 23-A Delegation of Powers:

The Government may, by notification, direct that all the powers under this Act except the powers,-

(1) to issue notice under sub-section (1) of section 3;

(2) to withdraw the land from acquisition under the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 4; and

(3) to make rules under section 25, shall, subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the notification, be exercised by the Collector.

11. It would not be possible for the Government to conduct enquiry in each and every case relating to the acquisition for industrial purposes. The Government therefore delegated all the essential functions under the Industrial Purposes Act to the District Collector concerned except the power to issue Notice under Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 or withdrawal of the land from acquisition under subsection (1) of section 4 or to make rules under Section 25.

12. The Government in exercise of the power conferred under Section 23-A of the Industrial Purposes Act, issued a notification dated 2 September 2005 authorising the District Collector of the

districts concerned to exercise all the functions under the Act. The notification dated 2 September 2005 was not challenged at any point of time. The learned single Judge considered the question as to whether it was proper on the part of the Government to conduct enquiry through the Collector and thereafter to issue notification under Sub-Section

(1) of Section 3 of the Industrial Purposes Act. According to the learned single Judge, since the notification under sub-section (1) of Section 3 has to be issued by the Government, enquiry should also be conducted only by the Government. The learned single Judge while quashing the acquisition though placed reliance on the Government order in G.O.Ms.No.513 dated 2 September 2005, made no attempt to interpret the said notification in the light of Section 23-A of the Industrial Purposes Act.

13. The learned single Judge proceeded as if the enquiry has to be conducted only by the Government. The very purpose of enacting Section 23-A of the Industrial Purposes Act and issuing the notification in G.O.Ms.No.513, dated 2 September 2005 was only for the purpose of giving power to the District Collector to conduct enquiry. In case, the enquiry has to be conducted by the Government in all such cases, the acquisition would be delayed and the very purpose of enacting the special statute would be defeated.

14. The District Collector after conducting enquiry under Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the Industrial Purposes Act must place all the materials before the Government. The Government would consider the objection given by the land owners, comments made by the District Collector and ultimately would take a decision as to whether notification under SubSection (1) of Section 3 of the Industrial Purposes Act should be issued for acquiring the land. Similar provisions are contained in other enactments, and more particularly in certain special statutes enacted by the State. This is not a case of delegation by way of executive order. The statute itself contained a provision for delegation. The Government has exercised the power of delegation conferred by the special statute and issued the order in G.O.Ms.No.513, dated 2 September 2005.

15. Before the learned single Judge neither the legality of Section 23-A nor the consequential order in G.O.Ms.No.513 dated 2 September 2005 were challenged. The learned single Judge was therefore not correct in interpreting the provision and the

related Government Order without a specific challenge.

16. The learned counsel for the first respondent has taken up a contention by placing reliance on Rule 6 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Rules, 2001, which provides for hearing objections by the Government.

17. Section 23-A of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act permits delegation of powers by the Government. The Collector, as a delegatee is empowered to conduct hearing of objections in the place of the Government. The fact that Rule 6 contains a provision for hearing of objections by the Government would not nullify Section 23-A of the Act giving the Government the power of delegation. Rule 6 is subject to Section 23-A of the Act. Wherever the name Government is shown in Rule 6, it has to be read as District Collector, in view of Section 23-A of the Act and the notification in G.O.Ms.No.513 Revenue dated 2 September 2005. We therefore reject the contention taken by the learned counsel for the first respondent on the strength of Rule 6 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Rules.

18. The power of judicial review conferred on the constitutional court is not to legislate. The Court can only interpret the law and cannot enter the field of legislation. The Court must interpret the provision enacted by the legislature in a particular manner, taking into account the intention of the legislature. It is not for the Court to say that the Government was not correct in delegating certain power to the executive without there being any challenge to the provision permitting such delegation.

19. We make the position clear that the District Collectors are empowered to conduct enquiry after issuing Notification under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Industrial Purposes Act and to forward the same with recommendation to the Government for issuance of notification under SubSection (1) of Section 3 of the Industrial Purposes Act. We hold that there is no legal requirement mandating that the enquiry should be conducted only by the Government.

20. In view of the reasons above, the order dated 10 July 2012 in W.P.No.2056 of 2010 is set aside. The writ petition in W.P.No.2056 of 2010 is dismissed.

21. In the upshot, we allow the intra court

appeal.

No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Section 23 A of the Act provides delegation of powers by the first respondent. All the powers under the Act except the powers to issue notice under sub-section (1) of Section 3, to withdraw the land from acquisition under the first proviso to sub-section

(1) of Section 4, and to make rules under section 25, shall be exercised by the second respondent. Therefore, the second respondent is empowered to conduct enquiry after issuance of notice under sub-section (2) of Section (3) of the Act and to forward the same with the recommendations to the first respondent for issuance of notification under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Act. Accordingly, the first point is answered against the petitioners.

10. All the petitioners were duly served notice under sub clause (2) of Section 3 of the Act. After receipt of notice, some of the petitioners submitted their objections and those objections were duly placed before the fourth respondent who is the requisitioning body as contemplated under Rule 6 (b) of the Act. After obtaining remarks from the fourth respondent, the second respondent conducted enquiry and forwarded the recommendations to the first respondent for issuance of notification under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Act. Some of the petitioners appeared and the remaining did not appear for enquiry. Therefore, the petitioners were sufficiently given opportunity of hearing on receipt of their objections and the second respondent conducted enquiry and forwarded the recommendations for issuance of notification as contemplated under sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Act.

11. Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel who assisted this Court and submitted that Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Section 3 sub-clause (2) of the Act are one and the same. Therefore, after receipt of the remarks on the objections raised by the petitioners, the petitioners may be given opportunity to see the remarks submitted by the requisitioning body and may be given opportunity to reply. Thereafter, the enquiry should be conducted by the second respondent after giving opportunity of hearing. In the case on hand, the second respondent did not place remarks received from the requisitioning body to the petitioners and as such it vitiates the entire acquisition proceedings.

12. In this regard, the learned Government Advocate relied upon the judgment in the case of N.Murugan Vs. District Collector, Kancheepuram reported in (2014) 5 LW 385, wherein it is held as follows:

13. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of K. Ramakrishnan v. The Government of Tamilnadu in W.P. Nos. 40850 of 2006 Batch, decided on 02.03.2007, has refused to quash the proceedings initiated under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, by holding as under:

"26. In pith and substance, the State Government for speedy industrial growth in the State felt the lands for industrial purpose have to be acquired speedily and enacted the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act with a conceptualized vision that more industries would be started in Tamil Nadu and the acquisition of lands for setting up such industries would be expedited to achieve the laudable object of big industrialization in the State of Tamil Nadu. Such power of the State to enact T.N.

Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act or such powers conferred under the authorities under the Act for speedy acquisition of lands for industrial purpose cannot be strangled on the ground of legislative competency, as such power of acquisition and requisitioning of property conferred under Entry 42 of List III (Concurrent List) is independent by itself, but not ancillary or incidental to the power to regulate mines and minerals under Entry 54 of List I (Union List). It is thus clear that neither the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act suffers from any legislative competency nor the impugned acquisition proceedings initiated under the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act suffer for want of jurisdiction. 27.1.

Next, we proceed to examine the attack on the impugned acquisition proceedings made by the land owners/interested persons, for non compliance of Rule 6 of the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Rules due to the failure to furnish the remarks of the requisitioning body/NLC. 27.2. Of course, our attention was invited to the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in Ramanujam N.D. v. Collector of Madras, 1994 WLR 326. The said case arose under the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where the lands were acquired by the Madras Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board/requisitioning body to provide water supply to the residents of a locality.

acquisition proceedings even though objections were filed by land owners/interested persons, there was no record to show that the reply of the requisitioning body was communicated to the petitioner therein to make the enquiry contemplated under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 effective and purposeful. Therefore, it was held that the enquiry conducted under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was illegal and contrary to the relevant Rules that are applicable for 5A enquiry in the matter of acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Rule 4 of the Land Acquisition (Tamil Nadu) Rules prescribes the procedure to be followed in the matter of hearing the objections of the land owners/interested persons to the acquisition and holding an enquiry in that regard. Rule 4 of Land Acquisition (Tamil Nadu) Rules reads as follows: "Rule (4)(a) If a statement of objections is filed by a person who is interested in the land, it shall be summarily rejected.

(b) If any objections are received from a person interested in the land and within the time prescribed in sub-section (1) of section 5-A, the Collector shall fix a date for hearing the objections and give notice thereof in Form 'B' to the objector as well as to the department or company acquiring the land. Copies of the objections shall also be forwarded to such department or company.

The department or company may file on or before the date fixed by the Collector, a statement by way of answer to the objections and may also depute a representative to attend the enquiry, (c) On the date fixed for enquiry or any other date to which the enquiry may be adjourned by the Collector, the Collector shall hear the objector, or a person authorised by him in this behalf, or his pleader and the representative, if any, of the department or company and record any evidence that may be produced by both in support of the objections and in support of the need for acquiring the land." 27.3. No doubt, the said Rule 4 of the Land Acquisition (Tamil Nadu) Rules framed under Section 55 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is akin to Rule 6 of T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Rules made under Section 25 of T.N.

Act. But, in view of Section 21 of the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, the provisions of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 are excluded save as otherwise provided in the Act, and therefore, neither the provision relating to the 5A enquiry nor the rules related to enquiry under Section 5A, nor the ratio laid with respect to the enquiry under Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 shall have any relevancy to the acquisition proceedings of the present Act. That apart, such a situation is not contemplated expressly either in Section 3 of the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act or under Rule 6 of T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Rules.

What all Section 3 contemplates is only to publish notice under Section 3(2) by the Government calling upon the land owners/interested persons to show cause as to why the lands should not be acquired and also cause a public notice in that regard, and thereafter to receive objection, forward the copy to requisitioning body and after getting statement by way of answer from the requisitioning body, to hold an enquiry and take a decision and thereafter pass an order under Section 3(1) as provided under Section 3(3) of the Act that the land is required for industrial purpose and in furtherance of the object of the Act. 27.4.

In our considered opinion, in view of Section 21 of the Act, the provisions of the Act and Rules should be interpreted strictly applying the golden rule of interpretation that the literal interpretation should be adhered to in the absence of any anomaly or absurdity in reading the words of the statute as it stands, and a statute cannot be looked at with a coloured glass.

28. Lastly, we are unable to comprehend such grievance of the land owners/interested persons that the Government failed to provide sufficient rehabilitation measures/safeguards to the land owners/interested persons, as contemplated under the National Policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation for Project Affected Families-2003, in view of the undertaking given by the respondents in the counter affidavit that rehabilitation package has been provided in order to give relief and rehabilitation measure to genuinely displaced land oustees, which, we record, would take care of the interest of the petitioners seeking sufficient rehabilitation

measures/safeguards under the National Policy on Resettlement and Rehabilitation for Project Affected Families-2003.

29. In fine, all the attempts to strangulate the impugned acquisition proceedings under the provisions of T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act fail as devoid of merits and for want of legal contentions.

30. Resultantly, (i) the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act and the Rules framed thereunder does not suffer from lack of legislative competency of the State Government and therefore, the same are held constitutionally valid;

(ii) the impugned acquisition proceedings initiated under the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act does not suffer any illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety; and (iii) the writ petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed. No costs." The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court held that neither the provision relating to the 5A enquiry nor the rules related to enquiry under Section 5A, the ratio laid with respect to the enquiry under Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 shall have any relevancy to the acquisition proceedings of the present Act. That apart, such a situation is not contemplated expressly either in Section 3 of the T.N. Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act or under Rule 6 of the Act. That apart, Section 21 of The Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 reads as follows:

21. Land Acquisition Act not to apply: Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Central Act I of 1894) shall cease to apply to any land which is required for the purpose specified in sub-section (1) of section 3 and any such land shall be acquired by the Government only in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

13. Accordingly, the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 shall cease to apply to any land which is required for the purpose specified under The Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997. Therefore, Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Section 3 subclause (2) of the Act are not connected each other.

14. That apart, as stated supra, all the petitioners were duly served notice under Section 3 (2) of the Act and some of the petitioners submitted their objections and also attended enquiry. Therefore, there is no violation of the procedures as contemplated under Sections 3 (2) and (3) of the Act read with Rule 6 (b) & (c ) of the Act, and there is no violation of Article 300 A of the Constitution of India.

15. In view of the above discussion, all the writ petitions do not have merits and are liable to be dismissed. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that The Tamilnadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 itself is challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Therefore, the petitioners are at liberty to challenge the proceedings subject to the result of the special leave petitions.

16. With the above observations, all the writ petitions are dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lok To 1.The Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Industries, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram 3.The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Unit-3, SIPCOT, Sriperumbudur Expansion Scheme-II, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District

4.The Managing Director, SIPCOT Unit-III, Sriperumbudur Expansion Scheme, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 5.The Special Tahsildar Land Acquisition, Unit-2, SIPCOT, Oragadam Expansion Scheme-II, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District 6.The Additional Chief Secretary State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Industries, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

7.The Principal Secretary State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Industries, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009 8.The Special District Revenue Officer, Irugattukottai, Sriperumbudur.

+2cc to Mr.M.Rajasekhar, Advocate, S.R.No.41134 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.40781 WP.Nos.1878 & 1879 of 2014 and MP.Nos.2 & 2 of 2014 and WP.No.2525 of 2014 & MP.No.2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.2014 to 2017 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.7739 to 7753 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 & MP.Nos.3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 of 2014 and WP.Nos.35589 to 35591 of 2015 and 36389 & 36390 of 2015 and MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2 of 2015 and WP.No.7998 of 2015 and WP.Nos.13577 to 13587 of 2014 & MP.Nos.3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3,3 of 2011 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.26981 to 26983 of 2014, 21185 to 21191 of 2014, 9933 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.22944 to 22951 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 and WP.Nos.24262 to 24267 of 2015 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2015 & WMP.Nos.6761 to 6765 of 2016 and WP.Nos.5198 to 5206 of 2014 & MP.Nos.2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2 of 2014 JP(CO) SB(30/03/2022)