Varaaki, S/O.V.Radhakrishnan, v. The Commissioner Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.9044 of 2016 Varaaki

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Commissioner of Police Commissionerate, Egmore, Chennai-8

...Respondent

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to provide necessary police protection and in particularly to restore the security with Gun-man which was already given by the respondent For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Addl. Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to provide necessary police protection and in particularly to restore the security with Gun-man which was already given by the respondent 2.It is seen that the petitioner has given a representation in the year 2016. Now, almost three years have been lapsed. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to give a fresh representation to the respondent and on receipt of such representation the respondent is directed to consider the representation and pass orders in accordance with law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of . No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsn To 1.The Commissioner of Police Commissionerate, Egmore, Chennai-8 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

W.P.No.9044 of 2016 SR(CO) SSM(21/03/2019).

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/