Haider Ali v. State Rep. By, The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.10.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL.O.P.No.16672 of 2025 Haider Ali ... Petitioner
Versus
The State rep by its, The Inspector of Police, Vandavasi South Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
(Crime No.94 of 2025) .. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.94 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :
Mr.Punniakoti Ganesan For Respondent :
Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(a)(i) and 4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws Act, 1930 (Amendment 2021) and under 1/5
Section 318(4) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.94 of 2025 seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused, involved in gambling activities through a whatsapp group to cheat the victim. It is further alleged that the respondent police seized videos, photographs and a sum of Rs.1,500/- from the arrested persons. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there are two accused in this case and the petitioner is ranked as A2; and that he has no previous case pending against him. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned 2/5
Government Advocate (Crl.side) and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides, the fact that the petitioner has no previous case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(b) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for 3/5
interrogation;
(c) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
25.10.2025 drl To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Vandavasi.
2. The Inspector of Police, Vandavasi South Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
4/5
K.RAJASEKAR, J.
drl CRL.O.P.No.16672 of 2025 25.10.2025 5/5