← Library
Madras High CourtWMP/20840/2024ordered

K.V.Venkadasalam v. The District Collector,

2024-07-18Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mrs Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi2 pages

W.M.P. No.20840 of 2024 in W.P. No.18989 of 2024 W.M.P. No.20840 of 2024 in W.P. No.18989 of 2024 M.SUNDAR,J., and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.) This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP'].

2. Captioned WMP has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of original of a 'notice dated 15.06.2024 bearing reference U.Mu.No.112/2024' {hereinafter 'impugned notice' for the sake of brevity}.

3. Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court.

4. Adverting to paragraph No.7 of the support affidavit, learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that original impugned notice was misplaced and hence, the writ petitioner was not able to produce the same. Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to paragraph No.7 of the support affidavit, which reads as follows:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page Nos.1/2

W.M.P. No.20840 of 2024 in W.P. No.18989 of 2024 M.SUNDAR, J., and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J., mk '7. I submit that the copy of the original impugned notice was misplaced. Hence, I am herewith file a true copy of the same. hence it is just and necessary to dispense with the production of the original impugned order dated 15.06.2024 made in U.Mu.No.112/2024 passed by the 3rd respondent under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 in the above writ petition.'

5. The above reason is accepted for the limited purpose of dispense with prayer in captioned WMP without expressing any other opinion in this order.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.J.) (K.G.T.J.) 18.07.2024 (1/2) mk W.M.P. No.20840 of 2024 in W.P. No.18989 of 2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page Nos.2/2