M.Murugan @ Samaya Murugan, v. The Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.28753 of 2014 M.Murugan @ Samaya Murugan ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamilnadu, High Court campus, Chennai.

2. L.Raju .... Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order made in Confl.No.1766/2013 dated 04.12.2013 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and further directing the first respondent to take the complaint on file and to refer the same to the disciplinary committee of Bar Council of Tamilnadu. For petitioner : Mr.M.Murugan - No appearance

O R D E R

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. On the last occasion i.e. On 20.01.2010, it was represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he has already given change of vakalat and this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and post the matter for hearing today.

2. Today the matter is listed under the caption ''for dismissal'' and petitioner's name has also printed in the cause list. However, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rli To The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamilnadu, High Court campus, Chennai.

+1cc to Government Pleader SR.NO. 5326 W.P. No.28753 of 2014 ssv(co) nr 27/02/2020 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/