N.Ramachandran v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.11.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.21378 of 2019
1. N.Ramachandran
2. V.Kamala
3. D.Kumaran
4. P.Vijayakumar r. R.Ramesh
6. R.Sreenivasulu
7. Y.Banumathi
8. G.Malathi
9. M.Munirathinam 10.M.Natarajan
11. G.Mallika
12. Gurusamy
13. M.Vinoth Kumar
14. M.Vasumathi
15. R.Shanmugapriya
16. P.Vadivel 17.K.Sampath Kumar
18. M.Mayakrishnan
19. S.Suresh
20. K.Poonkodi
21. V.Maheswari
22. J.Saravanan
23. V.Mahalakshmi
24. S.Veeramuthu
25. M.Dhanam
26. C.Sampath
27. S.Vivek 28.G.Thirumalaikannan
29. M.Muthuraman
30. P.Malarvizhi
31. M.Venkatesan
32. V.Shanthi
33. Govindaraj
34. R.Rajeswari
35. K.Ravi
36. V.Indra
37. R.Sivakumar
38. B.Poongavanam
39. P.Elumalai
40. A.Kamatchi
41. K.Valarmathi
42. N.Gowri
43. R.Parvathi 1/5
44. D.Venkatesan
45. A.Chinnachi
46. S.PArtheeban
47. M.Karunaiyammal
48. B.M.Natarajan ... Petitioners Vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Department of Education, St. George Fort, Chennai.
2. The Director of School Education, O/o. The Director of School Education, Nungambakkam, Chennai ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner with effect from the date of completion of 10 years of service with all monetary and service benefits. For Petitioner : Mrs. S.Esairani Narasimman For Respondent : Mrs.P.Kavitha Government Advocate for R1 & R2
O R D E R
By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
2.
The case of the petitioners is that they were engaged as daily wage basis in the Government Schools from elementary level to higher secondary level and they were paid by the Parent Teacher's Association Fund. Though, the petitioners have completed 10 years of service, their services were not regularized and therefore, they made a representation dated 27.02.2019 to the respondents seeking for regularization of service and to extend them all service benefits. Since no response is forthcoming from the respondents, the petitioners are constrained to file this writ petition.
3.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this Court has granted relief to the persons, who were similarly 2/5
situated like that of petitioners in WP No.15596 f 2013. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 27.02.2019 and pass orders, within a stipulated time fixed by this Court. 4.
Heard both sides.
5.
Though the petitioner has sought for a larger relief, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondents 1 to 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.02.2019 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, if not disposed already. 6.With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Asst.Registrar (Insp cell) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar rka To
1. The Secretary to Government The State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Education, St. George Fort, Chennai.
2. The Director of School Education, O/o. The Director of School Education, Nungambakkam, Chennai +25 cc to M/s.S.Esairani Narasimman Advocate sr91748 +1 cc to Government Pleader sr92489 W.P.No.21378 of 2019 aa28/11/2019 3/5