Manikandan v. State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.18925 of 2020 Manikandan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs.
The State represented by, ... Respondent/Complainant The Inspector of Police, (M-3), Puzhal Police Station, Chennai.
[Crime No.2724 of 2020] Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Crime No. 2724 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Illiyas For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference) Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has been arrested in this case and hence, this petition has become infructuous.
2.In view of the same, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
-sd/- 02/12/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE XV GEORGE TOWN, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE [FOR INFORMATION].
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, (M-3) PUZHAL POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.
CC to M/S.M.ILLIYAS Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.18925/2020 Date :02/12/2020 MN-08/12/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/