M.Vignesh v. Syndicate Bank
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02-02-2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM WP No.29909 of 2014 M.Vignesh
...Petitioner
vs.
Syndicate Bank, Represented by its Manager, Eriyur Branch, Sunjakalnatham Post, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
...Respondent
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 11.10.2014 and sanction Educational Loan to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.Kandhan Duraisami For Respondent : No Appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, made a submission that the cause aroused for the purpose of filing the present writ petition did not exist as of now. Thus, no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To The Manager, Syndicate Bank, Eriyur Branch, Sunjakalnatham Post, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
WP 29909 of 2014 AJS(CO) SP(16/02/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/