P.K.Mohanasundaram v. The Registrar Of Societies,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN P.K.Mohanasundaram ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Registrar of Cooperative Societies, NV Natarajan Maligai, No.170, Periyar E.V.R High Road, Kilapauk, Chennai-600010 2.The Joint Registrar/President, District Recruitment Bureau for Co-operatives, Joint Registrar of cooperative societies, Office of the Joint Registrar of Co-operative societies, 2nd floor, Collectorate campus, Namakkal-637003.
... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to consider petitioners candidature for the post of Assistant in the three unfilled vacancies under the differently abled category in the notification no.01/2023 dated 10.11.2023 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sathya Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.T.Chezhiyan Additional Government Pleader *****
O R D E R
1/5
The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer for issuing a Mandamus, directing the 2nd Respondent to consider petitioners candidature for the post of Assistant in the three unfilled vacancies under the differently abled category in the Notification No.01/2023, dated 10.11.2023 within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in pursuance of the above notification, he has participated in the written examination, however, he was not selected. It is the submission of the petitioner that there are 3 unfilled vacancies under the Differently Abled Category are available. If the 2nd respondent had properly appreciated the candidatures of this petitioner, he would have find a place in the selection list. It is the submission of the petitioner that he is having 80% permanent locomotor disability and eligible to be considered for the post of Assistant under the differently abled category.
3. Per contra, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would strongly object the contention of the petitioner and would submit that as per the roster, selection was made in which the 2/5
petitioner cannot have any grievance. However, if the petitioner is giving any representation, the same would be considered by the 2nd respondent in accordance with their rule position.
4. In such view of the fair submission, without going into the merits of the writ petition, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioner to submit a representation before the 2nd respondent, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. On such receipt of the representation, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the same and pass orders on it's own merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks thereafter.
5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 17.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order /Non Speaking Order dm 3/5
To 1.Registrar of Cooperative Societies, NV Natarajan Maligai, No.170, Periyar E.V.R High Road, Kilapauk, Chennai-600010 2.The Joint Registrar/President, District Recruitment Bureau for Co-operatives, Joint Registrar of cooperative societies, Office of the Joint Registrar of Co-operative societies, 2nd floor, Collectorate campus, Namakkal-637003.
4/5
C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
dm 17.06.2025 5/5