Raj v. The State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.17692 of 2021 RAJ [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANALMEDU POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.658 OF 2021.
For Petitioner : M/S.U.KATHIRAVAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 379 of IPC in Crime No.658 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reported that the accused person had been arrested.
3. Recording the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), that the accused person had been arrested there is no question of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedies in accordance with law. -sd/- 24/09/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
TO 1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANALMEDU POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.
+1 CC to M/S.U.KATHIRAVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.10666 CRL OP.17692/2021 Date :24/09/2021 RW 08/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/