Madras High CourtCRL OP/20715/2020dismissed

R.Vimal Raj v. State Rep By

2021-01-05Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.01.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.20715 of 2020 R.Vimal raj ... Petitioner -Vs.- The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Baluchetty Sathiram Police Station Kanchipuram District.

(Crime No.1671of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1671 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.G.Kartheeban For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor ******

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Section 341 of IPC, in Crime No.1671 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, the petitioner had abused the defacto complainant and also intimidated him. Hence, the complaint.

3. This is the second anticipatory bail applications. This Court, by an order dated 19.11.2020 in Crl.O.P.No.18197 of 2020 finding that the petitioner has got six previous cases, out of which one is under Section 397 of IPC and another one is under Section 420 of IPC and the other three cases are under Section 379 of IPC had dismissed the same.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Original Petition.

5. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner had got six previous cases pending, there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 05/01/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT NO.II, KANCHIPURAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPET [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BALUCHETTY SATHIRAM POLICE STATION, KANCHIPURAM.

CC to M/S T.V.G.KARTHEEBAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.20715/2020 Date :05/01/2021 MK:11/01/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/