S. Gururani v. The Union Of India Owning The Southern Railway

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.02.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR

1. S. Gururani (wife of the deceased)

2. S. Ragesh (minor son of the deceased)

3. S. Dharunkanth (minor son of the deceased)

4. R. Gandhimathi (mother of the deceased) ...

Appellants Vs The Union of India owning the Southern Railway represented by the General Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town Chennai 600 003.

... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 to set aside the order passed on 27.07.2021 in O.A.(II-U)/MAS/117/2019 by the Member (Technical) allow the appeal with interest and costs.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Vijay Anand 1/3

JUDGMENT

When the matter was listed for hearing on 23.01.2024 there was no representation for the appellants, hence the matter was directed to be listed on 31.01.2024. Even on 31.01.2024 there was no representation on behalf of the appellants and in order to give one more opportunity the matter was again directed to be listed on 02.02.2024 (today) under the caption for ''dismissal". When the case was called today none represented on behalf of the appellants and it is clear and evident that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the case.

2. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

02.02.2024 dpq Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-speaking Order 2/3

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

dpq 02.02.2024 3/3