← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/15998/2024granted

Shanmuga Sundaram @ Ottrai Mani v. The State Rep By

2024-07-09Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.335 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 21.06.2024, while the defacto complainant was standing near Maniyakaranpalayam bus stop, at the time, the petitioners who is the friend of the defacto complainant, demanded money to purchase liquor. When the same was refused by him, the petitioners along with others persons attacked the defacto complainant with legs, caused blood injuries and also intimidated him, thereby ran away from the scene of occurrence. Hence, the complaint.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioners, on their own volition, are ready and willing to contribute some amount to any

Charitable Purpose as may be directed by this Court. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that due to drunken mood, the petitioners along with other persons attacked the defacto complainant, for not giving money to purchase liquor, thereby causing injuries to him. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned counsel and also considering the fact that the petitioners without prejudice their rights, on their own volition, are ready and willing to contribute some amount to any charitable trust, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial

Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) jointly, to the credit of Crime No.335 of 2024 before the concerned Magistrate within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such deposit, the defacto complainant is permitted to withdraw the same, on filing undertaking affidavit and proper identification and acknowledgment."

(b) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioners shall report before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore on every Tuesday and Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of eight weeks; [d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

drl [e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

09.07.2024 drl