← Library
Madras High CourtSA/1932/2001dismissed for default

Balaraman v. Purushothaman

2018-06-08Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated :08.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.1932 of 2001 Balaraman ... Appellant Vs .

1.Purushothaman 2.Saroja

3. Vedagiri

4. M.Anbazhagi

5. Revathi ... Respondents Prayer :

The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 21.12.2000 in A.S.No.23 of 2000 passed by the learned SubOrdinate Judge, Maduranthakam, Chengalpet District confirming the decree and judgment dated 12.01.2000 in O.S.No.96/1992 passed by learned District Munsif, Maduranthakam, Chengalpet District.

For Appellant : M/s.N.Nagusah For Respondents : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan

JUDGMENT

Today, both side counsel present.

The learned counsel for the appellant reported 'no instructions'. The appellant is called absent. Therefore, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gv https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Sub-Ordinate Judge, Maduranthakam, Chengalpet District.

2. The District Munsif, Maduranthakam, Chengalpet District.

Copy To The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. (2 Copies) S.A.No.1932 of 2001 MG(CO) CS/22/06/18 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/