Boopathi @ Shanmugasundharam v. The State Rep By
T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(2) of IPC in Crime No.214 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 27.06.2024, while the petitioners went in front of the defacto complainant's house, at the time, the wordy quarrel arose between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, for which, the petitioners abused him with filthy language and also attacked the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioners, on their own volition, are ready and willing to contribute some amount to any Charitable Purpose as may be directed by this Court. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that it is a case and case in counter. He further submitted that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are relatives and on the date of occurrence, due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries to him. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned counsel and also considering the fact that the petitioners without prejudice their rights, on their own volition, are ready and willing to contribute some amount to any charitable trust, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate
concerned and on further condition that:
(a) the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) jointly, to the credit of Crime No.214 of 2024 before the concerned Magistrate within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on such deposit, the defacto complainant is permitted to withdraw the same, on filing undertaking affidavit and proper identification and acknowledgment."
(b) the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of eight weeks;
[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
drl [f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;
09.07.2024 drl