Prakash v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.324 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Totally, there are two accused involved in this case, in which, the petitioners are arrayed as A1 and A2. The case of the prosecution is that under the influence of alcohol, both the accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him with deadly weapons, threatened him with dire consequences and caused grievous injuries in his hand and immediately, he was hospitalized . Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

1/3

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that the injured was still in hospital at Coimbatore. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel and also the fact that the injured is still in hospital, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 04.08.2022 vv 2/3

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Vv 04.08.2022 3/3