P.Kannan v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.12.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.19047 of 2020 1.P.Kannan ... Petitioners 2.A.Prabhu Vs.

State rep.by ... Respondent/Complainant The Inspector of Police, Tiruverkadu Police Station, Chennai District.

[Crime No. 952 of 2020] Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.952 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners: M/s.M.K.Aseena For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 352 & 506 (ii) of IPC, in Crime No.952 of 2020, on the file of the respondent, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that the petitioners have abused and intimidated the defacto complainant to part with brokerage commission amount with regard to the land purchased by the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioners have abused and intimidated the defacto complainant to part with brokerage commission amount with regard to the land purchased by the defacto complainant. He would further submit that there is no previous case against the petitioners. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioners. 5.Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions; 6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the copy of the order is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Poonamallee, Tiruvallur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aaadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police every day at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

7.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 07/12/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I, POONAMALLEE, TIRUVALLUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE TIRUVALLUR [FOR INFORMATION].

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUVERKADU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.M.K.ASEENA Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.19047/2020 Date :07/12/2020 MN-15/12/2020