Sasikala v. M. Monisha

Crl.M.P.No.13751 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.19009 of 2021 Crl.M.P.No.13751 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.19009 of 2021 M.DHANDAPANI, J.

The respondent accused was implicated for the offence under Section 420 IPC in Cr.No.1027 of 2021 and had approached this Court and filed petition for anticipatory bail. This Court vide order dated 08.10.2021, had granted anticipatory bail to the respondent accused on condition that he shall pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- to the credit of the crime number and the same may be disbursed in favour of the petitioner herein, after obtaining affidavit of undertaking from the petitioner. However the said condition was not complied by the respondent accused. Hence this petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail, has been filed by the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though notice has been served and the name of the respondent printed in the cause list, no one has appeared on behalf of him.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions submitted that the condition of this Court, while granting anticipatory, bail has not been complied by the respondent accused. M.DHANDAPANI, J https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Crl.M.P.No.13751 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.19009 of 2021 sk

4. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court is of the view that the 1st respondent on his own volition only accepted to deposit a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- and eventhough reasonable time has been given, he has not deposited the said amount in the crime number. Since the 1st respondent has failed to comply the condition imposed by this Court, as ordered by this Court, the anticipatory bail granted by this Court on 08.10.2021, automatically stands vacated and further it is needless to state that it is the duty of the 2nd respondent police to take action against the 1st respondent, on non compliance of the order of this Court.

22.09.2022 sk Crl.M.P.No.13751 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.No.19009 of 2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2