The Tamilnadu Minerals Ltd v. Sagunthala

C.M.P.No.2662 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.85707 of 2023 (Filing Number) M.SUNDAR, J., and T.VINOD KUMAR. J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) Captioned 'Civil Miscellaneous Petition' has been filed with a 'Condonation of Delay' {hereinafter 'CoD' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity} prayer qua 116 days delay in filing the captioned intra-court appeal i.e., W.A.SR.No.85707 of 2023.

2. Mr.B.Vijay, learned counsel on record for CMP petitioner, adverting to paragraph No.17 of the support affidavit expresses regret for number of days being left blank but submits that the reason for delay was administrative procedure for filing an appeal which has been repeatedly described as file pushing by Courts.

3. However, Ms.H.Nandhini, learned counsel representing Mr.V.Ajoy Khose, counsel on record for sole respondent very fairly submits that respondent is not opposing the CoD prayer. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.SUNDAR, J., and T.VINOD KUMAR. J., mk

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of the matter and taking into account the fact that the respondent is not opposing CoD prayer, captioned CMP is ordered as prayed for i.e., delay condoned. There shall be no order as to costs. [M.S.J.,] [T.V.K.J.,] 07.08.2025 mk C.M.P.No.2662 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.85707 of 2023 (Filing Number) 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis