M.S.S.Transport v. Kutty Flush Doors And Furniture
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.02.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL & C.M.P.Nos.18714 and 18726 of 2024 1.M/s.M.S.S.Transport a Partnership Firm rep. By its Partner P.Suseela Ponnusamy Wife of Ponnusamy No.A-26-2/6-B1, New Workshop Corner Mettur Dam, Salem District - 636 401
2. M/s.Mettur Transports a Partnership Firm represented by its Partner R.Balaji Son of Rathinasamy No.142/144, Salem Main Road Mettur Dam, Salem District - 636 401
3. M/s.M.S.S.Logistics a Partnership Firm represented by its Partners Mani Karuppannan Son of Karuppanna Gounder No.104 A, New Workshop Corner Mettur Dam, Salem District - 636 401
4. M/s.Mettur Logistics 1/4
a Partnership Firm Represented by its Partner M.S.K.Selvakumar Son of Sellamuthu Pillai No.24/160, New Workshop Corner Mettur Dam, Salem District - 636 401 ... Appellants in both appeals
Versus
1. Kutty Flush Doors and Furniture Company Private Limited rep. By its Director and authorized Signatory P.K.Kader Kutty having registered Office at No.37, TNHB Phase III Ayapakkam Main Road, ICF Colony Ambattur, Chennai - 600 008
2. V.S.Villivakkam Velu
3. Nagarajan ... Respondents in both appeals Prayer in O.S.A.No.148 of 2024: Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the common fair and decretal order made in O.A.No.251 of 2024 in A.No.2217 of 2024 in C.S.No.71 of 2024 dated 28.06.2024.
Prayer in O.S.A.No.149 of 2024: Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the common fair and decretal order made in O.A.No.250 of 2024 in A.No.2216 of 2024 in C.S.No.71 of 2024 dated 28.06.2024.
For Appellants :
Mr.C.Munusamy in both appeals For Respondents :
Mr.Sharath Chandran for R1 in both appeals 2/4
COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The learned counsel for the appellants sought permission of this Court to withdraw above Original Side Appeals and requests that a direction may be issued to the learned single Judge to expedite the matter. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement in the case files.
2. Recording the endorsements, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. We are of the view that no such direction for speedy disposal can be issued to the learned single Judge. However, we request the learned Judge to dispose of the Civil Suit as expeditiously as possible. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
[N.S.K.,J.] [R.S.V.,J.] 06.02.2026 gpa To
1. IV Additional City Civil Court Chennai
2. The Section Officer VR Section Madras High Court 3/4
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J., AND R. SAKTHIVEL, J., gpa 06.02.2026 4/4