← Library
Madras High CourtWP/20877/2019closed

D.Murali v. The District Manager

2025-09-26Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR D.Murali ... Petitioner vs The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, (TASMAC), Thiruvallur (West), Thiruvallur District.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/1915/2013 dated 28.12.2015 and quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits including backwages. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Manoj Kumar For Respondent : Mr.K.Balakrishnan Standing Counsel

O R D E R

1/3

Mr.P.Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. 26.09.2025 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No dh To The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, (TASMAC), Thiruvallur (West), Thiruvallur District.

2/3

T. VINOD KUMAR , J.

dh 26.09.2025 3/3