S.Radha Krishnan v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.07.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.9943 of 2003 S.Radha Krishnan ... Petitioner vs.

1.

The District Collector, Karur District at Karur.

2.

The Commissioner, Karur Municipality at Karur.

3.

P.Ramamurthy ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 herein to take appropriate proceedings against the third respondent herein for running the Cable Television operations at Karur Town and within the area of operation of the petitioner herein without getting the No Objection Certificate under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Municipalities Television Cables Installation Regulation Rules, 2000 from the 2nd respondent and without complying with other provisions of law.

For Petitioner :

Mr.D.Krishna Pradeep For Respondents 1 & 2 :

Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Government Advocate

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

No costs. Consequently, connected W.P.M.P.No.12600 of 2003 and W.V.M.P.No.939 of 2003 are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar aeb To:

1.

The District Collector, Karur District at Karur.

2.

The Commissioner, Karur Municipality, Karur.

+1 cc to Mr.N.Damodaran Advocate sr 48358 W.P.No.9943 of 2003 msm(co) aa25/07/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/