L.Deenadayalan v. L.Anantharaman

1/4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :: 11-07-2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY CONTEMPT PETITION Nos.1157 of 2020 & 1163 of 2021 Cont.P.No.1157/2020 :

L.Deenadayalan ...

Petitioner -vs1.L.Anantharaman rep.by his Power Agent S.Stephen 2.L.Janarthanan 3.Jayashree Janarthanan 4.Pavithra Rajamurugan 5.Anusuya J.Komaleswari 6.Sindhuja Sathishkumar ...

Respondents Cont.P.No.1163/2021 :

Mr.L.Anantharaman rep.by his Power Agent S.Stephen ...

Petitioner -vsMr.L.Dheenadayalan ...

Respondent

2/4 Contempt Petition No.1157 of 2020 has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in O.S.A.No.102 of 2019, dated 11.09.2020. Contempt Petition No.1163 of 2021 has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in O.S.A.No.102 of 2019, dated 11.09.2020. For Petitioner in Cont.P.No.1157/2020 & Respondent in Cont.P.No.1163/2021 : Mr.M.Anandaraj For Petitioner in Cont.P.No.1163/201 & Respondent 1 in Cont.P.No.1157/2020 : Mr.I.Lakshmana Shankar For Respondents 2 to 6 in Cont.P.No.1157/2020 : Mr.P.Raja

ORDER

(By S.Vaidyanathan,J.) It is represented by the parties that the disputed wall, that was initially removed and reconstructed, has been removed and, that, in view of the discrepancy with regard to the measurement, they may be given liberty to approach the learned single Judge.

2. It is for the parties to take steps in accordance with law and we are not inclined to delve into that aspect.

3/4

3. Contempt Petitions are closed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected Sub Appln.No.441 of 2020 is also closed. Index : Yes/No (S.V.N.,J.) (K.R.,J.) Internet : Yes/No 11-07-2023 dixit

4/4 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.

AND KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

dixit CONT.P.Nos.1157/2020 & 1163/2021 11-07-2023