← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/14409/2026dismissed

Gandhi v. State Rep.By, The Inspector Of Police,

2026-06-09Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Gandhi ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Vridhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

Cr.No.209/2026.

..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to grant bail to the petitioner in connection with the Cr.No.209 of 2026 on the file of Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s):

M/S. T.Meganathan For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.04.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 296 (b), 351 (3), 109 and 103 of BNS and read with Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.209 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that in furtherance of a matrimonial dispute, the petitioner attacked his father-in-law and mother-in-law with a knife, causing injuries to his father-in-law to which he later succumbed. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been in custody since 20.04.2026. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that, due to matrimonial dispute, the petitioner attacked his parents-in-law with a knife. The father-in-law was subsequently admitted to the hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries. Fortunately, the petitioner's wife narrowly escaped. Hence, the learned Government Advocate opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner and the pendency of the investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Consequently, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

09-06-2026 ep

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Vridhachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District.

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras.

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

EP 09-06-2026