S.Pandarinathan v. Rangarajulu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM C.M.A.NPD.No.239 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.838 of 2004 S.Pandarinathan ... Appellant Vs.

1.

Rangarajulu 2.

Sri Korakkar Constructions, Rep. by Proprietrix, Shanthi Bai.

... Respondents Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Order 43 Rule (J) of CPC, against the Fair and Decreetal order dated 29.07.20003 made in E.A.No.2 of 2002 in E.P.No.42 of 1998 in O.S.No.86 of 1995 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikkal. For Appellant : Mrs.V.Renukadevi for M/s.N.A.Nissar Ahmed For Respondents : Service Awaited - - - - -

G.CHOCKALINGAM, J.

Jrl

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the matter has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. The endorsement reads as follows:- "Suit has become infructuous".

2. The above endorsement is recorded. Since the matter has become infructuous, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

25.11.2016 Internet :Yes Jrl To The Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikkal.

C.M.A.NPD.No.239 of 2004 http://www.judis.nic.in