Madras High CourtWP/33961/2013dismissed for nonprosecution

M.Mohanammal v. The Chief Secretary

2017-11-07Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.11.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33961 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 M.Mohanammal ..Petitioner Vs.

1.The Chief Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Principal Secretary-II to the Hon'ble Chief Minister in charge of Consumer Affairs, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

3.The Secretary to Government Co-Operation, Food and Consumer Protection (H1) Department Fort St.George, Selection Committee Member Chennai 600009.

4.The Secretary to Government Law Department Selection Committee Member Fort St.George, Chennai 600009.

5.The Hon'ble State President cum Chairman Selection Committee State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mylapore,Chennai 600 004.

.. Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to consider the petitioners for one Female Member Post in any of the vacancies of Consumer Forum i.e.1.Madurai, 2.Chennai (South), 3.Nagapattinam, 4.Perambalur, 5.Thanjavur, 6.Tiruchirappali, 7.Thiruvarur, 8, Chengalpattu, 9.Vellore, 10.Villupuram, 11.The Nilgiris, 12.Karur and 13.Cuddalore, as per the Tamil Nadu Arunthathiyars (Special

Reservation of Seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of appointments or posts in the services under the State within the Reservation for the Scheduled Castes) Act, 2009 dated 29.04.2009 framed under Section 13 of the above said act as reserved posts at 2,32,66,in the 100 point roaster.

For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.R.Vijayakumar Addl.Govt.Pleader

O R D E R

When the Writ Petition was listed for hearing on 06.11.2017, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner and the Registry was directed to list the matter on 07.11.2017, under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today (07.11.2017) also when the matter was called, none appeared for the writ petitioner. 2.In the light of the fact that there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, it is evident that the petitioner is not willing to get along with the matter and therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpa To 1.The Chief Secretary Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

2.The Principal Secretary-II to the Hon'ble Chief Minister in charge of Consumer Affairs, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

3.The Secretary to Government Co-Operation, Food and Consumer Protection (H1) Department Fort St.George, Selection Committee Member Chennai 600009.

4.The Secretary to Government Law Department Selection Committee Member Fort St.George, Chennai 600009.

5.The State President cum Chairman Selection Committee State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Mylapore,Chennai 600 004.

W.P.No. 33961 of 2013 GN(21/11/2017)